Contraception
Volume 53, Issue 1 , Pages 23-24 , January 1996

Intrauterine contraception in nulligravid vs parous women

  • J.L. Dueñas

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationName and address for correspondence: Jose Luis Dueñas Diez, M.D., Ph.D., Avda. Madrid, 9-Urbanizacion Villa Europa, 41807-Espartinas, Seville, Spain.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario “V. de la Macarena”, School of Medicine, University of Seville, Spain
    • ,
  • A. Albert

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario “V. de la Macarena”, School of Medicine, University of Seville, Spain
    • ,
  • F. Carrasco

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, School of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Spain

Received 8 June 1995 ,Revised 27 October 1995 ,Accepted 27 October 1995.

References 

  1. Tietze C, Lewit S. Recommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Stud Fam Plann. 1973;4:35
  2. Shelton JD, Taylor RN. The Pearl index reexamined: Still useful for clinical trials of contraceptive. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;139:592–596
  3. Chi IC. The Multiload IUD a U.S. researcher's evaluation of a European device. Contraception. 1992;46:407–425
  4. Struthers BJ. Copper IUDs, PID and fertility in nulliparous women. Adv Contracept. 1991;7:211–230
  5. Krommal RA, Whitney CW, Mumford SD. The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease: The Women's Health Study reanalysed. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:109–122

PII: 0010-7824(95)00025-9

Contraception
Volume 53, Issue 1 , Pages 23-24 , January 1996

Article Tools