Contraception
Volume 53, Issue 1 , Pages 33-36, January 1996

Effectiveness of Norplant® implants among Thai women in Bangkok

  • S. Chompootaweep

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationName and address for correspondence: Dr. Sumana Chompootaweep, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
    • Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • E. Kochagarn

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Health Research, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • S. Sirisumpan

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Health Research, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • J. Tang-usaha

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Health Research, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • B. Theppitaksak

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Health Research, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • N. Dusitsin

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Health Research, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Received 8 May 1995; received in revised form 7 August 1995; accepted 27 September 1995.

Abstract 

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy, acceptability, side effects and continuation rates of the implant system in Thai women.

A five-year clinical study of 308 women receiving Norplant®-6 implants in Bangkol was conducted. Acceptors' mean age was 29 years, and mean number of children was about two. More than half of the users (63%) finished primary school. The cumulative continuation rates for Norplant® implants at irst, second, third, fourth and fifth years were, respectively, 98%, 91%, 83%, 78% and 71%. Eight out of a total of eleven pregnancies occurred in the fourth and fifth year of use. The cumulative pregnancy rate was 1.1% for the third year, 2.0% for the fourth year and 4.2% for the fifth year. Desire for future pregnancy was the leading cause for termination of Norplant® implants use. The five-year cumulative termination rate for planned pregnancy was 9.2%. Disruption of menstrual rhythm, particularly increased bleeding, was the other main reason for termination; however, the prevalence of menstrual irregularities appeared to diminish with time. The cumulative termination rate for menstrual irregularities in the fifth year of the study was 4.4%. The complaints of “other medical reasons” for removal of Norplant® implants were acne, severe headache, and chloasma. The five-year cumulative termination rate for other personal reasons was 7.9%. These personal reasons were husband having vasectomy, husband objection and divorce.

It can be seen from this five-year study that Norplant® implants are well accepted by Thai women. However, the efficacy in preventing pregnancy was not acceptable during the fourth and fifth year of use in this study, which was different from results of other international studies.

Keywords:  Norplant® implants, contraceptive effectiveness

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: 0010-7824(95)00261-8

Contraception
Volume 53, Issue 1 , Pages 33-36, January 1996