Contraception
Volume 77, Issue 3 , Pages 147-154, March 2008

Being strategic about contraceptive introduction: the experience of the Standard Days Method®

  • James N. Gribble

      Affiliations

    • BRIDGE Project, Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC 20009, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 202 939 5403; fax: +1 202 328 3937.
  • ,
  • Rebecka I. Lundgren

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20008, USA
  • ,
  • Claudia Velasquez

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20008, USA
  • ,
  • Erin E. Anastasi

      Affiliations

    • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Rockville, MD 20852, USA

Received 28 August 2007; received in revised form 8 November 2007; accepted 14 November 2007. published online 18 January 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Many national and institutional family planning policies explicitly include fertility awareness-based methods among the method options that should be made available, but these methods are often not offered for a variety of reasons. After testing the efficacy of the Standard Days Method® (SDM), which is a fertility awareness-based method that identifies Days 8–19 of the menstrual cycle as fertile for women with cycles lasting between 26 and 32 days, pilot studies were conducted to introduce it into programs.

Study Design

Through 14 pilot studies around the world, ministries of health, family planning associations and community development organizations introduced the SDM. Follow-up interviews with users and other data collection methodologies were used to track user characteristics and experiences. Supervision data and simulated clients assessed the effects on service delivery.

Results

The SDM appeals to a broad range of women throughout the world. Clients report using abstinence or condoms to manage the fertile days. Both men and women report high levels of satisfaction with the method. The cross-study first-year failure rate of 14.1 pregnancies per 100 woman-years of use is similar to typical-use rates found in the SDM efficacy trial.

Conclusions

The results of the pilot studies offer guidance for scaling up service delivery of the SDM. Condom counseling can help many users manage the fertile window effectively. Because out-of-range cycles can lead to method failure, users must understand the importance of tracking cycle length and be willing to switch to another method when the SDM is contraindicated. Community providers can offer the method; within clinical settings, SDM counseling typically takes no more time than allowed in most program norms. Training providers to address alcohol use and gender-based violence improves SDM method use and contributes to better quality of care.

Keywords: SDM, Natural family planning, Periodic abstinence, Quality of care, CycleBeads, Contraceptive introduction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(07)00498-2

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.001

Contraception
Volume 77, Issue 3 , Pages 147-154, March 2008