Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 2 , Pages 155-161, August 2008

Predictors and perception of pain in women undergoing first trimester surgical abortion

  • Rameet H. Singh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 410 550 0335; fax: +1 410 550 0245.
  • ,
  • Khalil G. Ghanem

      Affiliations

    • Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
  • ,
  • Anne E. Burke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
  • ,
  • Mark D. Nichols

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • ,
  • Kathy Rogers

      Affiliations

    • Seneca Women's Health Care, Baltimore, MD 21239, USA
  • ,
  • Paul D. Blumenthal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

Received 25 September 2007; received in revised form 11 March 2008; accepted 12 March 2008. published online 28 May 2008.

Abstract 

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate pain and predictors of pain in women undergoing electric (EVA) or manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for first trimester surgical abortions and to examine how perceptions of pain differ among participants, advocates (participant support person) and physicians.

Study Design

In this randomized controlled study, women presenting for first trimester abortion underwent standardized EVA or MVA. Participants completed questionnaires, visual analog scales (VAS) and Likert scales for pain. Logistic and linear regression models were used to analyze the data.

Results

Nonwhite women and women who preoperatively expected more pain reported higher procedure-related pain scores. Vacuum source, previous history of abortion, comfort with decision to have an abortion and partner involvement did not affect participant pain scores. In the multivariable analyses, no single factor predicted procedure-associated pain. The advocates perceived that more educated women had less pain. Physicians felt longer procedures and a woman's fear of pelvic examinations caused more pain. Physicians believed women had less pain than the participants reported themselves (p<.001). Only physicians thought that EVA was less painful than MVA (p<.01).

Conclusion

Distinct factors other than vacuum source affect the perception of abortion-related pain. Understanding these factors may help inform counseling strategies aimed at ameliorating pain perception during first trimester abortions.

Keywords: Abortion, Pain, Vacuum, Aspiration, Manual, Electric

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(08)00137-6

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.011

Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 2 , Pages 155-161, August 2008