Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 4 , Pages 316-322, April 2010

Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy

  • Elizabeth Miller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 916 734 4689; fax: +1 916 456 2236.
  • ,
  • Michele R. Decker

      Affiliations

    • Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115-6096, USA
  • ,
  • Heather L. McCauley

      Affiliations

    • Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115-6096, USA
  • ,
  • Daniel J. Tancredi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
  • ,
  • Rebecca R. Levenson

      Affiliations

    • Family Violence Prevention Fund, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
  • ,
  • Jeffrey Waldman

      Affiliations

    • Planned Parenthood Shasta Diablo Affiliate, Concord, CA 94520-2309, USA
  • ,
  • Phyllis Schoenwald

      Affiliations

    • Planned Parenthood Shasta Diablo Affiliate, Concord, CA 94520-2309, USA
  • ,
  • Jay G. Silverman

      Affiliations

    • Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115-6096, USA

Received 24 September 2009; received in revised form 3 December 2009; accepted 4 December 2009. published online 29 January 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Reproductive control including pregnancy coercion (coercion by male partners to become pregnant) and birth control sabotage (partner interference with contraception) may be associated with partner violence and risk for unintended pregnancy among young adult females utilizing family planning clinic services.

Study Design

A cross-sectional survey was administered to females ages 16–29 years seeking care in five family planning clinics in Northern California (N=1278).

Results

Fifty-three percent of respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence, 19% reported experiencing pregnancy coercion and 15% reported birth control sabotage. One third of respondents reporting partner violence (35%) also reported reproductive control. Both pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage were associated with unintended pregnancy (AOR 1.83, 95% CI 1.36–2.46, and AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14–2.20, respectively). In analyses stratified by partner violence exposure, associations of reproductive control with unintended pregnancy persisted only among women with a history of partner violence.

Conclusions

Pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage are common among young women utilizing family planning clinics, and in the context of partner violence, are associated with increased risk for unintended pregnancy.

Keywords: Pregnancy, unwanted, Domestic Violence, Contraception, barrier, Family Planning Services

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding sources for this study are the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21 HD057814-02 to Miller and Silverman); UC Davis Health System Research Award to Miller; and Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health award to Miller (BIRCWH, K12 HD051958; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Office of Research on Women's Health, Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institute of Aging).

PII: S0010-7824(09)00522-8

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004

Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 4 , Pages 316-322, April 2010