Contraception
Volume 63, Issue 6 , Pages 319-323, June 2001

Rural and urban midwestern United States contraception practices

  • Shirley Ann Hartlage

      Affiliations

    • Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center/Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-312-563-2202; fax: +1-312-942-2177
  • ,
  • Cynthia Breaux

      Affiliations

    • Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center/Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Sarah Gehlert

      Affiliations

    • The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Louis Fogg

      Affiliations

    • Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center/Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract 

To address a paucity of demographic data on rural United States contraception practices, 370 randomly selected menstruating women, age 13–55 years, living in rural and urban Illinois and Missouri answered interview questions. Women with relatively few children and living in urban areas were likely to practice contraception more than those with relatively few children and living in rural areas, p < 0.01. In Illinois, more rural (23%) than urban (2%) women chose sterilization, p < 0.01. Single status was more frequent in Chicago (41%) and rural Missouri (32%) than in rural Illinois (19%), p < 0.002, and extant research links single status with risk for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Condom use did not differ significantly by locale, p > 0.05. Urban-rural differences in contraception practices may be a function of life style choices (e.g. urban women may practice contraception to postpone having children, whereas rural women may practice contraception to prevent having more children after families are complete). Results do not strongly support that locale differences in contraception practices are a function of concern about contracting STDs.

Keywords:  Rural, Women, Adolescent, Health, Contraception, HIV

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  The study was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grants, R10 55221 and R10 55226, awarded to S.A. Hartlage and S. Gehlert.

PII: S0010-7824(01)00210-4

Contraception
Volume 63, Issue 6 , Pages 319-323, June 2001