Contraception
Volume 63, Issue 6 , Pages 309-314, June 2001

Immediate postabortal contraception with the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, Norplant, and traditional methods

  • Nuriye Ortayli

      Affiliations

    • Woman and Child Health Training and Research Unit, Medical School of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +212-533-12 04; fax: +212-631-1710
  • ,
  • Aysen Bulut

      Affiliations

    • Woman and Child Health Training and Research Unit, Medical School of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Tulay Sahin

      Affiliations

    • Woman and Child Health Training and Research Unit, Medical School of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Irving Sivin

      Affiliations

    • Center for Biomedical Research, The Population Council, New York, NY, USA

Received 29 August 2000; accepted 27 March 2001.

Abstract 

Women seeking legal first trimester abortion were counseled concerning contraception methods available for use immediately postabortion. Fifty women each accepted hormonal methods that were available only in the clinic and were novel to the country, the levonorgestrel IUD and Norplant implants, whereas another 50 chose either coitus interruptus or abstinence. All were experienced contraceptors, but larger percentages of women selecting the levonorgestrel IUD or implants had used the pill or IUDs previously, were under age 30, and weighed less than 60 kg compared to the other study participants. In the initial 2–6 weeks postabortion, women using the long-acting hormonal methods resumed sexual activity earlier and experienced more bleeding and spotting days than did other study participants, but their hematocrits were not adversely affected. No clinically significant side effects were noted in any group in the 6 weeks following the abortion. At the end of 1 year of follow-up, women using the hormonal methods had experienced no pregnancies and had high rates of continuation. IUD and implant participants had greater weight gain than did the other participants, but their mean weight remained below that of participants using traditional methods. No significant between-group differences in levels or changes in levels from admission were noted in hematocrit and blood pressure. The women found the levonorgestrel implants and IUDs easy and safe to use and highly effective. Bleeding disturbances, including amenorrhea, were the principal features the women disliked.

Keywords: Abortion, Contraception, Levonorgestrel intrauterine device, Subdermal implant, Withdrawal, Manual vacuum aspiration, Bleeding, Pain, Pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  Mirena is the registered trademark of Leiras Pharmaceuticals for the IUD releasing 20 μg/day of levonorgestrel, and Norplant is the registered trademark of the Population Council for capsule implants releasing levonorgestrel.

PII: S0010-7824(01)00212-8

Contraception
Volume 63, Issue 6 , Pages 309-314, June 2001