Contraception
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 209-215, October 2001

Periodic abstinence and calendar method use in Hungary, Peru, the Philippines, and Sri Lanka1

  • Research Group on Methods for the Natural Regulation of Fertility

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Dr. Catherine d’Arcangues. Tel.: +41-22791-2111; fax: +41-22791-4171
    • Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Geneva, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Dr. Catherine d’Arcangues. Tel.: +41-22791-2111; fax: +41-22791-4171
    • darcanguesc@who.ch

Abstract 

Focus group research was conducted in four countries to understand how couples who use calendar methods determine when they are at risk of pregnancy, what behavior they adopt during the fertile phase, and whether or not they are satisfied with their method. Calendar and periodic abstinence method users do not all know how to make correct calendar calculations of the fertile period, report being sexually active during the fertile period, and desire a more comprehensive approach to sexual behavior during the fertile period. Men’s roles in the methods should be enhanced, and credible resources in the community should be enlisted to improve education, information, and communication.

Keywords:  Natural family planning, Contraception, Periodic abstinence, Focus groups, International

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  • 1 This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts, and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization.

 This study was funded by the UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction.

PII: S0010-7824(01)00252-9

Contraception
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 209-215, October 2001