Contraception
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 217-222, October 2001

Impact of oral contraceptive use on APC-resistance: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with three low-dose preparations

  • J. Endrikat

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49-304681-7864; fax: +49-304681-8191
    • Schering AG, Müllerstr. 178, D-13342 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • M. Noah

      Affiliations

    • Dade Behring Marburg GmbH, Postfach 1149, D-35001 Marburg, Germany
  • ,
  • C. Gerlinger

      Affiliations

    • Schering AG, Müllerstr. 178, D-13342 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • R. Bannemerschult

      Affiliations

    • Schering AG, Müllerstr. 178, D-13342 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • W. Junge

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorium für Klin. Forschung, Lise-Meitner-Str. 25-29, D-24223 Raisdorf/Kiel, Germany
  • ,
  • A. Ruebig

      Affiliations

    • Schering AG, Müllerstr. 178, D-13342 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • W. Schmidt

      Affiliations

    • Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • ,
  • B. Düsterberg

      Affiliations

    • Schering AG, Müllerstr. 178, D-13342 Berlin, Germany

Abstract 

The evaluation of the study was of the impact of oral contraceptive (OC) use on activated protein C (APC-resistance). Eight hundred eighteen young fertile women were screened for a study designed to compare three different marketed OC preparations. The women could have used either other oral contraceptive preparations before switching to the study medications (switchers) or were not using hormonal contraceptives (new starters) before the study began. Prior to study drug intake and during treatment, APC-resistance was determined with three different tests. Forty-one of 809 women evaluated (5.07%) carried the Factor V Leiden mutation. Twenty-two further participants (2.72%) had a positive screening test, but did not provide samples for the confirmatory mutation test. Two women with homozygous Factor V Leiden mutations and 39 women with heterozygous mutations were identified. The homozygous carriers were identified in all three of the screening tests employed, whereas none of the tests detected all 39 heterozygotes. In the pretreatment screening tests, previous OC users (switchers) had slightly lower APC ratios than the women using non-hormonal birth control methods (starters). During treatment the difference between starters and switchers was no longer apparent, but the APC ratio values of the screening tests slightly increased for both. The homozygous carriers were not treated. Differences in APC-resistance between users of the three different oral contraceptive preparations were not found.

In conclusion, laboratory screening for APC-resistance using Coatest™ APC, ProC™ Global, or ProC™ APC-FV-Leiden clearly identifies homozygous mutant carriers. However, with regard to heterozygous mutant carriers, the sensitivity and specificity of the tests, especially during OC intake, is limited. The results of APC screening tests should have, at present, no impact on contraceptive counseling because the predictive value for thromboembolic risk of the test results and even the mutant status is low.

Keywords: Oral contraceptives, APC-resistance, APC-resistance screening

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(01)00253-0

Contraception
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 217-222, October 2001