Contraception
Volume 67, Issue 4 , Pages 281-285, April 2003

The acceptability of combined oral hormonal contraceptives in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

  • Junling Chen

      Affiliations

    • Shanghai Institute of Family Planning Technical Instruction, 145 Guangyuan Road, Shanghai 200030, People’s Republic of China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-86-21-64334629; fax: +86-21-64748015.
  • ,
  • Karen B Smith

      Affiliations

    • Contraceptive Development Network, Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, The Chancellor’s Building, 49 Little France, Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB UK
  • ,
  • Susan Morrow

      Affiliations

    • Contraceptive Development Network, Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, The Chancellor’s Building, 49 Little France, Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB UK
  • ,
  • Anna Glasier

      Affiliations

    • Contraceptive Development Network, Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, The Chancellor’s Building, 49 Little France, Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB UK
  • ,
  • Linan Cheng

      Affiliations

    • Shanghai Institute of Family Planning Technical Instruction, 145 Guangyuan Road, Shanghai 200030, People’s Republic of China

Received 2 May 2002; received in revised form 18 September 2002; accepted 7 November 2002.

Abstract 

Although combined oral hormonal contraceptives have been described as the most significant medical advance of the 20th century, the usage rate in the People’s Republic of China is considerably lower than in developed countries. This survey aimed to explore the acceptability of combined oral hormonal contraceptives (COC) amongst women aged 18–35 years who attended the family planning clinic in the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital in Shanghai, as well as amongst gynecologists who worked in the same hospital. In total, 500 clients and 89 gynecologists were recruited. Only 12% of the clients had ever used COC. Women with a lower educational level or parous women were more likely to use COC (p < 0.05). COC was the third most popular method recommended by the gynecologists (85.4%). Both groups were concerned about the risks and side effects of COC, especially younger doctors and doctors with fewer years of experience (p < 0.01). The results of the survey suggest that it is necessary to provide improved training about COC to reproductive-aged women and professionals to dispel misunderstandings of the pill.

Keywords:  Oral contraceptives, Knowledge, Risks and benefits

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(02)00487-0

doi:10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00487-0

Contraception
Volume 67, Issue 4 , Pages 281-285, April 2003