Contraception
Volume 69, Issue 5 , Pages 361-366, May 2004

Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates

  • Anna Glasier

      Affiliations

    • Lothian Primary Care NHS Trust Family Planning and Well Woman Services, 18 Dean Terrace, Edinburgh EH4 1NL, Scotland, UK
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 1NL, Scotland, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44-131-332-7941.
  • ,
  • Karen Fairhurst

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 1NL, Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • Sally Wyke

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 1NL, Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • Sue Ziebland

      Affiliations

    • University of Oxford Department of Primary Health Care, Oxford, England, UK
  • ,
  • Peter Seaman

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 1NL, Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • Jeremy Walker

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 1NL, Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • Fatim Lakha

      Affiliations

    • Lothian Primary Care NHS Trust Family Planning and Well Woman Services, 18 Dean Terrace, Edinburgh EH4 1NL, Scotland, UK

Received 18 December 2003; received in revised form 5 January 2004; accepted 7 January 2004.

Abstract 

A number of small studies have demonstrated increased use of emergency contraception (EC) when women have a supply available at home. It has been suggested that widespread use of EC could reduce abortion rates. We undertook a community intervention study designed to determine whether offering advanced supplies of EC to large numbers of women influenced abortion rates. All women aged between 16 and 29 years living in Lothian, Scotland, were offered, through health services, five courses of EC without cost to keep at home. Of a population of around 85,000 women in this age group, the study showed that an estimated 17,800 women took a supply of EC home and over 4500 of them gave at least one course to a friend. It was found that nearly half (45%) of women who had a supply used at least one course during the 28 months that the study lasted. In total, an estimated 8081 courses of EC were used. EC was used within 24 h after intercourse on 75% of occasions. Abortion rates in Lothian were compared with those from three other health board areas of Scotland. No effect on abortion rates was demonstrated with advanced provision of EC. The results of this study suggest that widespread distribution of advanced supplies of EC through health services may not be an effective way to reduce the incidence of unintended pregnancy in the UK.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(04)00022-8

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2004.01.002

Contraception
Volume 69, Issue 5 , Pages 361-366, May 2004