Contraception
Volume 71, Issue 3 , Pages 188-192 , March 2005

Interpretation of the BBT chart: using the “Gap” technique compared to the Coverline technique

Received 30 August 2004 ,Revised 19 October 2004 ,Accepted 22 October 2004.

References 

  1. Demouzon J, Testart J, Lefevre B, Pouly J, Frydman R. Time relationships between basal body temperature and ovulation or plasma progestins. J. Reprod. Med. 1984;41:254–259
  2. Moghissi KS. Ovulation detection. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 1992;21:39–55
  3. McCarthy JJ, Rockett HE. Prediction of ovulation with basal body temperature. J. Reprod. Med. 1986;31:742–747
  4. Hilgers TW, Bailey AJ. Natural family planning II: basal body temperature and estimated time of ovulation. Obstet. Gynecol. 1980;55:333–339
  5. Billings JJ. The ovulation method. 5th ed.. Collegeville (Minn): The Liturgical Press; 1987;
  6. Guyton AC. Textbook of medical physiology. 8th ed.. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1991;
  7. World Health Organization. Natural family planning: what health workers need to know. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995;
  8. Kass-Annese B, Aumack K, Goodman L. Guide for natural family planning trainers. 1st ed.. Los Angeles: Institute for International Studies in Natural Family Planning; 1990;
  9. Kambic R, Gray RH. Interobserver variation in estimation of day of conception intercourse using selected natural family planning charts. Fertil. Steril. 1989;51:430–434
  10. McCarthy JJ, Rockett HE. A comparison of methods to interpret the basal body temperature graph. Fertil. Steril. 1983;39:640–646
  11. Bauman JE. Basal body temperature: unreliable method of ovulation detection. Fertil. Steril. 1981;36:729–733
  12. Guida M, Tommaselli GA, Palomba S, et al. Efficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning program. Fertil. Steril. 1999;72:900–904
  13. Stanford JB, Lemaire JC, Fox A. Interest in natural family planning among female family practice patients. Fam. Pract. Res. J. 1994;14:237–249
  14. Frank E, White R. An updated basal body temperature method. Contraception. 1996;54:319–321
  15. Dunlop AL, Allen AS, Frank E. Involving the male partner for interpreting the basal body temperature graph. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001;98:133–138
  16. Klaus H. Natural family planning: a review. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 1982;37:128–150
  17. Martinez AR, Bernardus RF, Vermeiden JP, Shoemaker J. Reliability of home urinary LH tests for timing of insemination: a consumer's study. Hum. Reprod. 1992;7:751–753
  18. Robinson JN, Lockwood GM, Dalton JD, Fanklin PA, Farr M, Barlow DH. A randomized prospective study to assess the effect of the use of home urinary luteinizing hormone detection on the efficiency of donor insemination. Hum. Reprod. 1992;7:63–65
  19. Rosner B. Biostatistics. 4th ed.. Boston: Duxbury Press; 2001;
  20. Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson L, Piccinino L. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: New data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 1997;23(19):
  21. Population Reference Bureau. 2002 World population reference sheet. Washington (DC): Population Reference Bureau; 2002;
  22. Stanford JB, Lemaire JC, Thurman PB. Women's interest in natural family planning. J. Fam. Pract. 1998;46:65–71
  23. Frank-Herrman P, Freundl G, Baur S, et al. Effectiveness and acceptability of the symptothermal method of natural family planning in Germany. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991;165:2052–2054
  24. Marshall J, Rowe B. The effect of personal factors on the use of the basal body temperature method of regulating births. Fertil. Steril. 1972;23:417–421
  25. Labbok MH, Queenan JT. The use of periodic abstinence for family planning. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989;32:387–402
  26. Rice FJ, Lanctot CA, Garcia-Devesa C. Effectiveness of the sympto-thermal method of natural family planning: an international study. Int. J. Fertil. 1981;26:222–230

PII: S0010-7824(04)00300-2

doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.10.010

Contraception
Volume 71, Issue 3 , Pages 188-192 , March 2005