« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 73, Issue 3
, Pages 229-234
, March 2006
Safety and efficacy of an extended-regimen oral contraceptive utilizing continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol
References
- . The progestins. In: Goldzeiher JW editors. Pharmacology of the contraceptive steroids. New York: Raven Press; 1994;p. 5–19
- . Hormone withdrawal symptoms in oral contraceptive users. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:261–266
- Shorter pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives decreases follicular development. Contraception. 1996;54:71–77
- . Ovarian activity in women taking an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 150 microg desogestrel: effects of low estrogen doses during the hormone-free interval. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:S18–S24
- . A multicenter, randomized study of an extended cycle oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2003;68:89–96
- . Endometrial microstructure after long-term use of a 91-day extended-cycle oral contraceptive regimen. Contraception. 2005;71:55–59
- . Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:632–639
- Omitting the first oral contraceptive pills of the cycle does not automatically lead to ovulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:41–46
- . Longitudinal ultrasonographic study of the ovarian suppressive activity of a low-dose triphasic oral contraceptive during correct and incorrect pill intake. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1159–1162
- Ovarian consequences of the transient interruption of combined oral contraceptives. Int J Fertil. 1992;37:270–276
- . A randomized cross-over comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives upon hormonal and metabolic parameters: I. Effects upon sexual hormone levels. Contraception. 1985;31:583–593
- . Ortho Evra/Evra versus oral contraceptives: follicular development and ovulation in normal cycles and after an intentional dosing error. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:34–42
- . The influence of the dose of ethinylestradiol in oral contraceptives on follicle growth. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1995;9:299–305
- . Manipulation of the pill-free interval in oral contraceptive pill users: the effect on follicular suppression. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:943–951
- Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285:2347–2354
- . A multicenter, uncontrolled clinical investigation of the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new low dose oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel over six treatment cycles. Contraception. 1997;56:285–290
- . Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 150 microg desogestrel in Latin-American women. Adv Contracep. 1998;14:15–26
- . An open-label randomized comparative study of oral contraceptives between medications containing 3 mg drospirenone/30 μg ethinylestradiol and 150 μg levonogestrel/30 μg ethinylestradiol in Thai women. Contraception. 2004;69:23–26
- . Cycle control, quality of life and acne with two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 μg ethinylestradiol. Contraception. 2004;69:469–476
- . Bleeding patterns and patient acceptability of standard or continuous dosing regimens of a low-dose oral contraceptive: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2003;67:9–13
- . Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:579–616
- . Use of an oral contraceptive containing drospirenone in an extended regimen. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003;8:162–169
- . Outcomes of extended oral contraceptive regimens with a shortened hormone-free interval to manage breakthrough bleeding. Contraception. 2004;70:281–287
- . Extending the duration of active oral contraceptive pills to manage hormone withdrawal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:179–183
- . Acceptance of altering the standard 21-day/7-day oral contraceptive regimen to delay menses and reduce hormone withdrawal symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1142–1149
PII: S0010-7824(05)00366-5
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.09.010
© 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 73, Issue 3
, Pages 229-234
, March 2006
