Contraception
Volume 73, Issue 5 , Pages 507-511, May 2006

Hormone levels before and after tubal sterilization

  • Gwen P. Gentile

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York–Downstate, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
  • ,
  • Donald W. Helbig

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York–Downstate, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
  • ,
  • Howard Zacur

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
  • ,
  • Taesung Park

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, South Korea
  • ,
  • Young Jack Lee

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA
    • Hanyang University, Seoul 122-791, South Korea
  • ,
  • Carolyn L. Westhoff

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10032, USA
    • The Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10032, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Received 1 November 2005; received in revised form 21 November 2005; accepted 14 December 2005. published online 23 February 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether women experience significant luteal phase hormonal changes following interval tubal sterilization.

Design

This is a partly randomized, prospective clinical study.

Setting

This study involved healthy volunteers in an academic research environment.

Patients

This study involved 118 fertile women seeking tubal sterilization and 57 fertile controls with at least three normal cyclic menstrual periods before entry into the study.

Interventions

The patients were randomized to bipolar cautery or Hulka clip as sterilization methods. Barrier contraception or abstinence was used by controls.

Main Outcome Measures

The main outcome measures are serum estradiol and progesterone levels and urinary estradiol and pregnanediol levels obtained during the luteal phase before, 1 year and 2 years after sterilization.

Results

The women randomized to the bipolar cautery group had higher midluteal progesterone levels measured between Days 5 and 11 postovulation (15.5 ng/mL before sterilization, 14.5 ng/mL at 1 year and 14.5 ng/mL at 2 years) than did the other two groups. The clip group had progesterone levels of 14.1, 12.0 and 12.5 ng/mL at baseline, 1 year and 2 years, respectively, and the control group had levels of 12.0, 11.9 and 11.3 ng/mL for the same periods. Serum estradiol and progesterone and urinary pregnanediol and estradiol were not significantly changed over the 2-year period, nor were there significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

There were no significant hormonal changes in sterilized women over a period of 2 years when compared with their baseline levels or when compared with unsterilized age-matched controls.

Keywords: Laparoscopic tubal sterilization, Posttubal sterilization syndrome, Estradiol level, Progesterone level, Bipolar tubal cauterization, Hulka clip sterilization, Luteal phase hormonal levels

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(05)00480-4

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.12.002

Contraception
Volume 73, Issue 5 , Pages 507-511, May 2006