Contraception
Volume 74, Issue 6 , Pages 451-457, December 2006

Efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of the combined contraceptive ring, NuvaRing, compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 μg of ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg of drospirenone

  • Hans-Joachim Ahrendt

      Affiliations

    • Halberstädter Straβe 122, D-39112 Magdeburg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 391 60 19 60; fax: +49 391 60 40 74.
  • ,
  • Israel Nisand

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hautepierre Hospital, 67098 Strasbourg Cédex, France
  • ,
  • Carlo Bastianelli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynaecolgy, Perinatology and Childcare, University of Rome La Sapienza, 00161 Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Maria Angeles Gómez

      Affiliations

    • Family Planning Centre, Valencian Health Agency, 03013 Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson

      Affiliations

    • Division for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska Institute, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Wolfgang Urdl

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
  • ,
  • Birgit Karskov

      Affiliations

    • Værløse Lægehus, Bymidten 39, 1, 3500 Værløse, Dk Denmark
  • ,
  • Luc Oeyen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynecology, Saint Vincent Hospital, St. Vincentiusstraat 20, 2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
  • ,
  • Johannes Bitzer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Geert Page

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gasthuisstraat 59, 8970 Poperinge, Belgium
  • ,
  • Ian Milsom

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden

Received 10 February 2006; received in revised form 25 July 2006; accepted 26 July 2006. published online 28 September 2006.

Abstract 

Purpose

This randomized multicenter, open-label, trial compared efficacy, acceptability, tolerability and compliance of NuvaRing with a combined oral contraceptive (COC), containing 30 μg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 3 mg of drospirenone.

Method

In this 13-cycle study, 983 women were randomized and treated (intent-to-treat population) with NuvaRing or COC.

Results

One in-treatment pregnancy occurred with NuvaRing (Pearl Index=0.25) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.006, 1.363) and four with the COC (Pearl Index=0.99) (95% CI: 0.269, 2.530). For both groups, compliance (89.2% NuvaRing, 85.5% COC) and satisfaction (84% NuvaRing; 87% COC) were high; the vast majority of women found NuvaRing easy to insert (96%) and remove (97%). Tolerability was similar; the most frequent adverse events with NuvaRing were related to ring use, whereas estrogen-related events were more common with the COC.

Conclusion

NuvaRing has comparable efficacy and tolerability to a COC containing 30 μg of EE and 3 mg drospirenone. User acceptability of both methods was high.

Keywords: NuvaRing, Contraceptive, Compliance, Efficacy, Tolerability, Pill

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(06)00308-8

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.004

Contraception
Volume 74, Issue 6 , Pages 451-457, December 2006