« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 74, Issue 6
, Pages 439-445
, December 2006
Evaluation of a continuous regimen of levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol: phase 3 study results
References
- . Preferred frequency and characteristics of menstrual bleeding in relation to reproductive status, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use. Contraception. 1999;59:357–362
- Women's and providers' attitudes toward menstrual suppression with extended use of oral contraceptives. Contraception. 2004;70:359–363
- Amenorrhea associated with contraception—an international study on acceptability. Contraception. 2003;67:1–8
- . Extending the duration of active oral contraceptive pills to manage hormone withdrawal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:179–183
- . Acceptance of altering the standard 21-day/7-day oral contraceptive regimen to delay menses and reduce hormone withdrawal symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1142–1149
- . Is norethisterone a lifestyle drug? Results of database analysis. BMJ. 2000;320:291
- . A multicenter, randomized study of an extended cycle oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2003;68:89–96
- . Continuous combination oral contraceptive pills to eliminate withdrawal bleeding: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:653–661
- . Effect on ovarian activity of a continuous-use regimen of oral levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(Suppl.):S24;[Abstract]
- . Menstrual bleeding patterns in untreated women and with long-acting methods of contraception. Task Force on Long-Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility Regulation. Adv Contracept. 1991;7:257–270
- . Efficacy and safety of a low-dose monophasic combination oral contraceptive containing 100 μg levonorgestrel and 20 μg ethinyl estradiol (Alesse®). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(Suppl.):S39–S44
- . Comparative trial of continuous-use and 21-day cyclic levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(Suppl.):12S;[Abstract]
- Shorter pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives decreases follicular development. Contraception. 1996;54:71–77
- . Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD004695;[Review]
☆ This study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00245921) was supported by a grant from Wyeth Research (Collegeville, PA). Drs. David F. Archer, Jeffrey T. Jensen and Julia V. Johnson were investigators for this study and received research funding from Wyeth Research. Other sources of research funding and/or financial relationships include the following: Agile Therapeutics, Berlex, Genentech, Warner Chilcott, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Ortho-McNeil, Organon International, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Barr Laboratories, Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson and Wyeth for Dr. Archer; Berlex, Warner Chilcott, Pfizer, Organon International and Barr Laboratories for Dr. Jensen; and Berlex, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacia, Procter & Gamble for Dr. Johnson. Drs. Hannah Borisute, Gary S. Grubb and Ginger D. Constantine are employees of Wyeth Research. Other financial affiliations are Merck, Teva and Johnson & Johnson for Dr. Borisute; and Johnson & Johnson for Dr. Grubb. Dr. Constantine has no financial affiliations.
PII: S0010-7824(06)00310-6
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.005
© 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 74, Issue 6
, Pages 439-445
, December 2006
