Contraception
Volume 77, Issue 1 , Pages 44-49 , January 2008

A qualitative study of barriers to postpartum sterilization and women's attitudes toward unfulfilled sterilization requests

  • Melissa Gilliam

      Affiliations

    • Section of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 773 834 0840; fax: +1 773 702 0840.
  • ,
  • Shawna D. Davis

      Affiliations

    • Section of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
  • ,
  • Amy Berlin

      Affiliations

    • Section of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
  • ,
  • Nikki B. Zite

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Box U-27, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA

Received 16 April 2007 ,Revised 5 September 2007 ,Accepted 18 September 2007.

References 

  1. Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 2005;23:1–160
  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) . Benefits and risks of sterilization. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 46. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:647–658
  3. Goodman EJ, Dumas SD. The rate of successful reactivation of labor epidural catheters for postpartum tubal ligation surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:258–261
  4. Costello C, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Jamieson DJ, Peterson HB. The effect of interval tubal sterilization on sexual interest and pleasure. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:511–517
  5. Curtis KM, Mohllajee AP, Peterson HB. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception. 2006;73:205–210
  6. Kelekci S, Erdemoglu E, Kutluk S, Yilmaz B, Savan K. Risk factors for tubal ligation: regret and psychological effects impact of Beck Depression Inventory. Contraception. 2005;71:417–420
  7. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1161–1168[discussion 1168-70]
  8. Zite N, Wuellner S, Gilliam M. Failure to obtain desired postpartum sterilization: risk and predictors. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:794–799
  9. Zite N, Wuellner S, Gilliam M. Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization. Contraception. 2006;73:404–407
  10. Marshall M. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 1996;13:522–525
  11. Muhr T. ATLAS.ti for Windows. Berlin: Scientific Software Development. 1997;
  12. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks (Calif): SAGE Publications Ltd; 1994;
  13. Johnson R, Roter D, Powe N, Cooper L. Patient race/ethnicity and Quality of patient–physician communication during medical visits. Public Health. 2004;94:2084–2090
  14. Oddone E, Horner R, Johnston D, et al. Carotid endarterectomy and race: do clinical indications and patient preferences account for differences?. Stroke. 2002;33:2936–2943
  15. Heinrich LB. Contraceptive self-efficacy in college women. J Adolesc Health. 1993;14:269–276

 This study is supported by an anonymous foundation. Dr. Gilliam is supported by grant #5K23-HD042614-02 from The National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Child Health and Development.

PII: S0010-7824(07)00427-1

doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.011

Contraception
Volume 77, Issue 1 , Pages 44-49 , January 2008