Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 2 , Pages 136-142, August 2008

Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion

  • Suzan Goodman

      Affiliations

    • University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110. Tel.: +1 415 202 4679; fax: +1 415 206 8387.
  • ,
  • Sarah K. Hendlish

      Affiliations

    • Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, San Francisco, CA 94109, USA
  • ,
  • Courtney Benedict

      Affiliations

    • Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, San Francisco, CA 94109, USA
  • ,
  • Matthew F. Reeves

      Affiliations

    • University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
    • Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
  • ,
  • Madeline Pera-Floyd

      Affiliations

    • Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, San Francisco, CA 94109, USA
  • ,
  • Anne Foster-Rosales

      Affiliations

    • University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
    • Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, San Francisco, CA 94109, USA

Received 4 August 2007; received in revised form 4 March 2008; accepted 13 March 2008. published online 19 June 2008.

Abstract 

Background

We hypothesize that barriers to IUD insertion are central to low utilization in the USA. This study evaluates methods to minimize barriers, including post-abortal insertion, staff training and simplified screening.

Study Design

We obtained data on IUD utilization during three study periods: a control period (Period 1), a period after initiating post-abortal insertion and staff training (Period 2), and a period with these interventions plus simplified screening for interval insertions (Period 3). We evaluated IUD utilization, associated complications and utilization at a similar local agency in which the interventions were not implemented.

Results

We inserted 2172 IUDs during the study, including 1493 interval and 679 post-abortal insertions. In the control period, there were 28 monthly IUD insertions on average, compared to 71 (a 151% increase) and 122 (a 334% increase) in Periods 2 and 3, respectively. IUD utilization at the nearby agency remained relatively constant. Complications remained low.

Conclusions

IUD utilization can be substantially increased through relatively simple, low-cost interventions, with significant potential to reduce unintended pregnancy.

Keywords: Intrauterine device, IUD, Intrauterine contraception, Post-abortal insertion, Barriers

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Financial support for this study was provided by FEI Women's Health (now DuraMed), producers of Paragard® T380A intrauterine copper contraceptive, who sponsored a Staff Training Pilot at Planned Parenthood Golden Gate (part of the intervention study). Ms. Hendlish is concurrently a research consultant for Berlex, Inc (now Bayer Health Care, Inc.), producers of Mirena® levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

PII: S0010-7824(08)00134-0

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.008

Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 2 , Pages 136-142, August 2008