Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion☆
Abstract
Background
We hypothesize that barriers to IUD insertion are central to low utilization in the USA. This study evaluates methods to minimize barriers, including post-abortal insertion, staff training and simplified screening.
Study Design
We obtained data on IUD utilization during three study periods: a control period (Period 1), a period after initiating post-abortal insertion and staff training (Period 2), and a period with these interventions plus simplified screening for interval insertions (Period 3). We evaluated IUD utilization, associated complications and utilization at a similar local agency in which the interventions were not implemented.
Results
We inserted 2172 IUDs during the study, including 1493 interval and 679 post-abortal insertions. In the control period, there were 28 monthly IUD insertions on average, compared to 71 (a 151% increase) and 122 (a 334% increase) in Periods 2 and 3, respectively. IUD utilization at the nearby agency remained relatively constant. Complications remained low.
Conclusions
IUD utilization can be substantially increased through relatively simple, low-cost interventions, with significant potential to reduce unintended pregnancy.
Keywords: Intrauterine device, IUD, Intrauterine contraception, Post-abortal insertion, Barriers
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ Financial support for this study was provided by FEI Women's Health (now DuraMed), producers of Paragard® T380A intrauterine copper contraceptive, who sponsored a Staff Training Pilot at Planned Parenthood Golden Gate (part of the intervention study). Ms. Hendlish is concurrently a research consultant for Berlex, Inc (now Bayer Health Care, Inc.), producers of Mirena® levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
PII: S0010-7824(08)00134-0
doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.008
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
