Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 3 , Pages 211-217, September 2008

Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device

  • Amy K. Whitaker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
  • ,
  • Lisa M. Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
  • ,
  • Bryna Harwood

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Mail Code 808, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 312 996 7430; fax: +1 312 996 4238.
  • ,
  • Laurel Chiappetta

      Affiliations

    • Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
  • ,
  • Mitchell D. Creinin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
  • ,
  • Melanie A. Gold

      Affiliations

    • Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

Received 20 February 2008; received in revised form 24 April 2008; accepted 28 April 2008. published online 04 July 2008.

Abstract 

Background

This study aimed to assess adolescent (aged 14–18 years) and young adult (aged 19–24 years) women's knowledge of and attitudes toward intrauterine devices (IUDs) before and after a brief educational intervention.

Study design

We administered a 43-item survey to 144 women aged 14–24 years, with half in each age category. The survey assessed knowledge of and attitudes toward IUDs, and incorporated a 3-min educational intervention about IUDs. Predictors for knowledge of and attitudes toward the IUD were examined using logistic regression.

Results

Forty percent of participants had heard of the IUD. Having ever heard of the IUD was associated with age >18 years [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=5.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=2.1–15.7], a higher level of maternal education (adjusted OR=4.5; 95% CI=1.5–13.3) and a history of voluntary sexual intercourse (adjusted OR=4.9; 95% CI=1.0–23.5). Of those who had heard of the IUD previously, 37.5% reported a positive attitude toward the IUD before the intervention. After the educational intervention, 53.5% of all participants reported a positive attitude toward the IUD, with both adolescent and young adult women having similarly positive attitudes (51.4% vs. 55.6%, p=.62). This positive attitude was associated only with a history of voluntary sexual intercourse (adjusted OR=5.2; 95% CI=1.3–21.1). The characteristics of the IUD that the participants strongly liked and disliked were rated similarly by the two age groups. However, more adolescent women considered the privacy of the IUD and the ability to use the copper IUD for 10 years as positive characteristics.

Conclusion

Most young women were unaware of IUDs but were likely to think positively about IUDs after being educated about them. Demographic and reproductive health history did not predict attitude; thus, all young women should be offered education about IUDs.

Keywords: Adolescent, Contraception, IUD (intrauterine device), Contraception knowledge, Contraception attitude

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by the Center for Family Planning Research, Magee-Womens Hospital (Pittsburgh, PA).

PII: S0010-7824(08)00284-9

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.119

Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 3 , Pages 211-217, September 2008