Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 3 , Pages 218-225, September 2008

Ovulation inhibition with four variations of a four-phasic estradiol valerate/dienogest combined oral contraceptive: results of two prospective, randomized, open-label studies☆☆

  • Jan Endrikat

      Affiliations

    • Bayer, Inc., Toronto, Ontario M9W 1G6, Canada
    • Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Frauenklinik, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Bayer, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Ontario M9W 1G6, Canada. Tel.: +1 416 246 5033; fax: +1 416 248 9526.
  • ,
  • Susanne Parke

      Affiliations

    • Bayer Schering Pharma AG, D-13342 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Dietmar Trummer

      Affiliations

    • Bayer Schering Pharma AG, D-13342 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Werner Schmidt

      Affiliations

    • Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Frauenklinik, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • ,
  • Ingrid Duijkers

      Affiliations

    • Dinox BV, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Christine Klipping

      Affiliations

    • Dinox BV, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 31 July 2007; received in revised form 19 April 2008; accepted 6 May 2008. published online 14 July 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Attempts to improve the tolerability of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have included the substitution of ethinylestradiol (EE) with 17β-estradiol (E2). However, this has proved unsatisfactory, specifically in terms of cycle control. To improve upon the poor cycle control seen previously, E2 [in the form of estradiol valerate (E2V); 1 mg of E2V contains 0.76 mg of E2] was combined with dienogest (DNG) in a novel four-phasic regimen. In the current studies, the ovulation-inhibition potency of four variations of this regimen was assessed.

Study Design

Two randomized, open-label, Phase II studies were performed. The first study compared two regimens (Regimens 1A and 2A) with similar dosages of DNG but different lengths of application. Having established in Study 1 that the length of application of Regimen 2A was most suitable, but that the dosages of DNG were too low for effective ovulation inhibition, a second study, which compared two regimens (Regimens 2B and 2C) with similar lengths of application but with increased dosages of DNG, was undertaken. The primary efficacy variable in both studies was the proportion of women with a Hoogland score of 5 or 6 during Cycle 2.

Results

The full analysis set comprised 192 and 203 women in Studies 1 and 2, respectively. In Study 1, 10 women (10.9%) in Regimen 1A and 6 women (6.4%) in Regimen 2A had a Hoogland score of 5 or 6. In Study 2, three women (3.1%) in Regimen 2B and one woman (1.0%) in Regimen 2C had a Hoogland score of 5 or 6. There were no safety concerns with any of the regimens.

Conclusion

The results of these studies identified a four-phasic COC preparation comprising E2V/DNG that provides efficient ovulation inhibition. It is expected that this regimen will lead to an innovative COC containing E2 instead of EE.

Keywords: Ovulation inhibition, Four-phasic regimen, Estradiol valerate, Dienogest

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Bayer Schering Pharma AG (Berlin, Germany).

☆☆ Jan Endrikat, Susanne Parke, and Dietmar Trummer are employees of Bayer Schering Pharma AG. Ingrid Duijkers and Christine Klipping are employees of the Contract Research Organisation Dinox BV who were contracted to perform the studies.

PII: S0010-7824(08)00288-6

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.05.004

Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 3 , Pages 218-225, September 2008