Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 5 , Pages 377-383, November 2008

Risk of hyperkalemia in women taking ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and other oral contraceptives

  • Jeanne Loughlin

      Affiliations

    • Ingenix i3 Drug Safety, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 781 472 8460; fax: +1 781 472 8464.
  • ,
  • John D. Seeger

      Affiliations

    • Ingenix i3 Drug Safety, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
    • Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • ,
  • P. Mona Eng

      Affiliations

    • Ingenix i3 Drug Safety, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
  • ,
  • Marie Foegh

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC 20057, USA
    • Agile Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
  • ,
  • C. Robin Clifford

      Affiliations

    • Ingenix i3 Drug Safety, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
  • ,
  • Jennifer Cutone

      Affiliations

    • Veristat, Inc., Holliston, MA 01746, USA
  • ,
  • Alexander M. Walker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    • World Health Information Science Consultants, LLC, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA

Received 10 April 2008; received in revised form 26 June 2008; accepted 27 June 2008. published online 11 August 2008.

Abstract 

Background

The oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg/drospirenone 3 mg (EE/DRSP) contains a progestin component that possesses potassium-sparing diuretic activity similar to spironolactone. We sought to determine whether EE/DRSP use might lead to adverse effects possibly attributable to hyperkalemia.

Study Design

This was a matched cohort study in which we identified oral contraceptive (OC) initiators between July 2001 and June 2004 within a large, US health plan. We matched EE/DRSP initiators to other OC initiators in a 1:2 ratio on the basis of a prediction model (propensity score) of EE/DRSP initiation that incorporated dozens of characteristics. We identified insurance claims mentioning hyperkalemia, related clinical outcomes (electrolyte disturbances, arrhythmia, syncope, myocardial infarction) and verified the underlying condition through medical record review.

Results

There were 22,429 EE/DRSP initiators matched to 44,858 other OC initiators, with an average follow-up of 7.6 months. A composite clinical surrogate hyperkalemia end point occurred with equal frequency in the compared groups [118 cases in EE/DRSP and 260 in comparators; rate ratio (RR) 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7–1.1]. The individual hyperkalemia surrogate end points exhibited similar results. One EE/DRSP initiator and four comparators were diagnosed specifically with hyperkalemia (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.0–4.9). The results were not different when we accounted for changes in OC use during follow-up.

Conclusion

EE/DRSP initiators are no more likely than other OC initiators to experience hyperkalemia or related clinical outcomes which could be caused by hyperkalemia during follow-up.

Keywords: Oral contraceptive, Drospirenone, Hyperkalemia, Risk management, Epidemiology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by a research contract between Ingenix i3 Drug Safety and Berlex (now a unit of Bayer Health Care). The contract granted i3 Drug Safety oversight of the study conduct, reporting and interpretation, as well as final wording of any resulting manuscripts.

PII: S0010-7824(08)00342-9

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.06.012

Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 5 , Pages 377-383, November 2008