« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 6
, Pages 451-458
, December 2008
Effects of switching from oral to transdermal or transvaginal contraception on markers of thrombosis
References
- Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2005;72:168–174
- Oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1527–1535
- Estrogens, progestogens and thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1:1371–1380
- . Risk of venous thromboembolism with cyproterone or levonorgestrel contraceptives. Lancet. 2001;358:1427–1429
- . Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2001;323:131–134
- Srivastava A, Weiss M. First Patch Death; Coroner confirms it. New York Post. April 28, 2004, 2004: 13.
- Edelman S, Kranes M. ‘Patch’ shock grows: kin ID new ‘victims’. New York Post. May 16, 2004, 2004: 1.
- Venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke among transdermal contraceptive system users. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:339–346
- Further results on the risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism in users of the contraceptive transdermal patch compared to users of oral contraceptives containing norgestimate and 35 microg of ethinyl estradiol. Contraception. 2007;76:4–7
- Risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism in women using a contraceptive transdermal patch and oral contraceptives containing norgestimate and 35 microg of ethinyl estradiol. Contraception. 2006;73:223–228
- Teal S.B., Ginosar D.M. Contraception for women with chronic medical conditions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2007;34:113–126, ix.
- Comparison of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs. oral contraceptives on hemostasis variables. Contraception. 2008;77:77–83
- Effects of oral and transdermal hormonal contraception on vascular risk markers: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:278–284
- Effects of transdermal and oral contraceptives on estrogen-sensitive hepatic proteins. Contraception. 2006;74:293–296
- Multicenter comparison of the contraceptive ring and patch: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:267–277
- . A nomograph method for assessing body weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 1976;29:302–304
- . Pharmacological profile of progestins. Maturitas. 2004;47:277–283
- . Effects of oral contraceptives on hemostasis and thrombosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:S375–S382
- Activated protein C resistance determined with a thrombin generation-based test predicts for venous thrombosis in men and women. Br J Haematol. 2003;122:465–470
- . Activated protein C resistance — a major risk factor for thrombosis. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1997;35:501–516
- Acquired APC resistance and oral contraceptives: differences between two functional tests. Br J Haematol. 1999;105:88–94
- Can changes in sex hormone binding globulin predict the risk of venous thromboembolism with combined oral contraceptive pills?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:482–490
- Sex hormone-binding globulin — a surrogate marker for the prothrombotic effects of combined oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:332–337
- . Sex-hormone-binding globulin. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1974;3:69–96
- . Sex hormone binding globulin capacity as an index of oestrogenicity or androgenicity in women on oral contraceptive steroids. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1979;10:39–45
- Comparison of the lipoprotein, carbohydrate, and hemostatic effects of phasic oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or levonorgestrel. Contraception. 2001;63:1–11
- Effects of seven low-dose combined oral contraceptives on sex hormone binding globulin, corticosteroid binding globulin, total and free testosterone. Contraception. 1990;41:345–352
- The influence of hormonal contraceptives on sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) capacity. Contraception. 1975;11:53–59
- . Thrombophilia and pregnancy. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:111
- Oral contraceptives and coronary artery atherosclerosis of cynomolgus monkeys. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:217–222
- . Thrombophilia and women's health: an overview. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2006;33:347–356
☆ This publication was made possible in part with biostatistics support from the Biostatistics Shared Resource of Oregon Health and Science University and laboratory support from the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), grant numbers UL1 RR024140 01 and M01 RR000334 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Funding for the main study was directly from the Magee-Women's Research Institute Foundation using funds from Organon USA. Organon USA, Inc., played no role in the design of either study; in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data; in the drafting or revision of the manuscript; or technical support or supervision of the study.
☆☆ Conflict of interest: Dr. Jensen: research funding: Bayer, Organon, Galen, Symbollon, Wyeth, Pfizer, Novartes; speakers bureau: Bayer, Wyeth; consulting: Bayer, Wyeth, Novartes. Dr. Burke: research funding: Organon, Duramed, Bayer. Dr. Barnhart: research funding: Organon, Wyeth-Ayerst, Johnson & Johnson, Duramed, Xanodyne, Boehringer Ingelheim, Third Wave, Pfeizer, MGI Pharma; speakers bureau: Organon; consulting: Novo Nordisk. Dr. Peters, Ms. Messerle-Forbes and Ms. Tillotson: no conflicts.
PII: S0010-7824(08)00368-5
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.004
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 78, Issue 6
, Pages 451-458
, December 2008
