Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 1 , Pages 35-40, January 2009

Both a combined oral contraceptive and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate impair endothelial function in young women

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of the University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil

Received 19 November 2007; received in revised form 24 July 2008; accepted 25 July 2008. published online 01 October 2008.

Abstract 

Background

The study was conducted to determine whether the use of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) interferes with endothelial function.

Study Design

The study was conducted on 100 women between the ages of 18 and 30 years. Fifty women had not used hormonal contraception (control group) for at least 12 months, 25 were current users of a COC (ethinylestradiol 30 mcg+levonorgestrel 150 mcg) and 25 were current users of DMPA (150 mg) for at least a 6-month period. All women were evaluated for brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD), intima-media thickness, carotid distensibility and stiffness index, arterial pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, heart rate and lipid profile.

Results

A significant difference in FMD was observed between the COC and control groups (6.4±2.2% vs. 8.7±3.4%, p<.01) and between the DMPA and control groups (6.2±2.1% vs. 8.7±3.4%, p<.01). The DMPA group had lower values of total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) than COC users and the control group (TC: DMPA=139.9±21.5 mg/dL vs. controls=167.1±29.2 mg/dL vs. COC=168.2±37.5, p=.001; LDL-C: DMPA=85.3±20.1 mg/dL vs. controls=102±24.5 mg/dL vs. COC=106.7±33.3 mg/dL, p=.01). The control group had higher levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) than the DMPA and COC groups (controls=52.4±14.1 mg/dL vs. DMPA=42.2±7.2 mg/dL vs. COC=45.4±9.1 mg/dL, p=.001). No significant differences were observed regarding the other variables.

Conclusions

FMD was lower among COC and DMPA users, suggesting that these hormonal contraceptives may promote endothelial dysfunction.

Keywords: Combined oral contraceptives, Echographic cardiovascular markers, Endothelial functional, Progestogen-only contraceptives, Arterial function, Cardiovascular disease

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding information: This study received public financial support from the Human Reproduction Division of the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of the University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

PII: S0010-7824(08)00428-9

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.024

Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 1 , Pages 35-40, January 2009