Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 5 , Pages 379-384, May 2009

Changes in abortion provider practices in response to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003☆

  • Lisa Haddad

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    • ,
  • Susan Yanow

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Health Consultant, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 492 1155; fax: +1 732 907 1813.
    • ,
  • Laurent Delli-Bovi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    • ,
  • Kate Cosby

      Affiliations

    • Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94612, USA
    • ,
  • Tracy A. Weitz

      Affiliations

    • Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94612, USA

Received 31 August 2008; received in revised form 6 November 2008; accepted 17 November 2008. published online 19 January 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The April 2007 Supreme Court Gonzalez v. Gonzalez v. Carhart decision upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. We conducted a pilot study that measured the impact of the ban in one state with a diverse pool of second-trimester abortion providers.

Study Design

A survey was administered via telephone to key informants at each facility in Massachusetts where second-trimester abortions are performed in order to assess clinical and administrative changes following the Supreme Court decision.

Results

Five hospital-based practices introduced injections to induce fetal demise prior to dilation and evacuation for later second-trimester abortions. One site stopped providing dilation and evacuation abortions in the absence of fetal or maternal indications, and another significantly decreased its volume of procedures. Training opportunities were decreased, and costs at three facilities increased.

Conclusions

The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 resulted in a range of practice changes in Massachusetts, particularly in hospitals. These changes reflect adherence to legal and policy mandates and not the availability of new scientific evidence. Further study to assess the impact of the ban in states with fewer providers is warranted.

Keywords: Second-trimester abortion, Partial-birth abortion ban, Practice changes

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

☆ This research was partially funded by a David and Lucile Packard Foundation award to the University of California, San Francisco.

PII: S0010-7824(08)00538-6

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.010

Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 5 , Pages 379-384, May 2009

Article Tools