Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 5 , Pages 379-384 , May 2009

Changes in abortion provider practices in response to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003

  • Lisa Haddad

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • ,
  • Susan Yanow

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Health Consultant, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 492 1155; fax: +1 732 907 1813.
  • ,
  • Laurent Delli-Bovi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • ,
  • Kate Cosby

      Affiliations

    • Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94612, USA
  • ,
  • Tracy A. Weitz

      Affiliations

    • Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94612, USA

Received 31 August 2008 ,Revised 6 November 2008 ,Accepted 17 November 2008.

References 

  1. Gonzales v. Carhart. 127 S.Ct. 1610; 2007.
  2. Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. 18 USC § 1531; 2007.
  3. Darney PD, Rosenfield A. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:226–227
  4. Drey EA, Thomas LJ, Benowitz NL, Goldschlager N, Darney PD. Safety of intra-amniotic digoxin administration before late second-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1063–1066
  5. Greene MF. The intimidation of American physicians—banning partial-birth abortion. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2128–2129
  6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist . ACOG Statement on the US Supreme Court Decision Upholding the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Press Release. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2007;
  7. Foster DG, Jackson RA, Cosby K, Weitz TA, Darney PD, Drey EA. Predictors of delay in each step leading to an abortion. Contraception. 2008;77:289–293
  8. Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception. 2006;74:334–344
  9. Jones RK, Zolna MRS, Henshaw SK, Finer LB. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40:6–16
  10. Steinauer J, Landy U, Filippone H, Laube D, Darney PD, Jackson RA. Predictors of abortion provision among practicing obstetrician–gynecologists: a national survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:39.e1–39.e6
  11. Blumenthal PD, Castleman LD, Jain JK. Abortion by labor induction. In:  Paul M,  Lichtenberg ES,  Borgatta L,  Grimes DA,  Stubblefield PG editor. A clinician's guide to medical and surgical abortion. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1999;p. 150–151
  12. Jackson RA, Teplin VL, Drey EA, Thomas LJ, Darney PD. Digoxin to facilitate late second-trimester abortion: a randomized, masked, placebo-controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:471–476
  13. Hern WM. Laminaria, induced fetal demise and misoprostol in late abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;75:279–286
  14. Molaei M, Jones HE, Weiselberg T, McManama M, Bassell J, Westhoff CL. Effectiveness and safety of digoxin to induce fetal demise prior to second-trimester abortion. Contraception. 2008;77:223–225
  15. Pasquini L, Pontello V, Kumar S. Intracardiac injection of potassium chloride as method for feticide: experience from a single UK tertiary centre. BJOG. 2008;115:528–531

 This research was partially funded by a David and Lucile Packard Foundation award to the University of California, San Francisco.

PII: S0010-7824(08)00538-6

doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.010

Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 5 , Pages 379-384 , May 2009