Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 6 , Pages 407-410 , June 2009

Better than nothing or savvy risk-reduction practice? The importance of withdrawal

  • Rachel K. Jones

      Affiliations

    • Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY 10038, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 212 248 1111x2262.
  • ,
  • Julie Fennell

      Affiliations

    • Sociology Department, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT 06050, USA
  • ,
  • Jenny A. Higgins

      Affiliations

    • Office of Population Research, Wallace Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
  • ,
  • Kelly Blanchard

      Affiliations

    • Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Received 4 December 2008 ,Revised 19 December 2008 ,Accepted 20 December 2008.

References 

  1. Miller R. Withdrawal: “A very great deal better than nothing.". Canadian J Hum Sex. 2003;12:189–190
  2. Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL, Cates W, Stewart FH, Lowal D. Contraceptive technology. 19th ed.. New York (NY): Ardent Media; 2007;
  3. Kost K, Singh S, Vaughan B, Trusell J, Bankole A. Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception. 2008;77:10–21
  4. Rogow D, Horowitz S. Withdrawal: a review of the literature and an agenda for research. Stud Fam Plann. 1995;26:140–153
  5. Kulczycki A. The determinants of withdrawal use in Turkey: a husband's imposition or a woman's choice?. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1019–1033
  6. Okun BS. Family planning in the Jewish population of Israel: correlates of withdrawal use. Stud Fam Plann. 1997;28:215–227
  7. Wiebe ER, Janssen PA, Henderson A, Fung I. Ethnic Chinese women's perceptions about condoms, withdrawal and rhythm methods of birth control. Contraception. 2004;69:493–496
  8. Santow G. Coitus interruptus and the control of natural fertility. Population Stud. 1995;49:19–43
  9. Santow G. Coitus interruptus in the twentieth century. Population Devel Rev. 1993;19:767–792
  10. Zukerman Z, Weiss DB, Orvieto R. Does preejaculatory penile secretion originating from Cowper's gland contain sperm?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:157–159
  11. Pudney J, Oneta M, Mayer K, Seage G, Anderson D. Pre-ejaculatory fluid as potential vector for sexual transmission of HIV-1. Lancet. 1992;340:1470
  12. Ilaria G, Jacobs JL, Polsky B, et al. Detection of HIV-1 DNA sequences in pre-ejaculatory fluid. Lancet. 1992;340:1469
  13. Potts M, Diggory P. Traditional methods. In:  Potts M,  Diggory P editor. Textbook of Contraceptive Practice. 2nd ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983;p. 74–83
  14. Ortayli N, Bulut A, Ozugurlu M, Cokar M. Why withdrawal? Why not withdrawal? Men's perspectives. Reprod Health Matters. 2005;13:164–173
  15. Mosher WD, Martinez GM, Chandra A, Abma JC, Willson SJ. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States, 1982–2002. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no 350. Hyattsville (Md): National Center for Health Statistics; 2004;
  16. Gray A, Chowdhury JH, Caldwell B, Al-Sabir A. Coitus-dependent family planning methods: observations from Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann. 1999;30:43–53
  17. Higgins JA, Hoffman S, Graham CA, Sanders SA. Relationships between contraceptive method and sexual pleasure and satisfaction: results from the Women's Wellbeing and Sexuality Study. Sexual Health. 2008;5:321–330
  18. Higgins JA, Browne I. Sexual needs, control, and refusal: examples of how “doing” class and gender influences sexual risk taking. J Sex Res. 2008;45:233–245
  19. Higgins JA, Hirsch JS. Pleasure and power: Incorporating sexuality, agency, and inequality into research on contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1803–1813
  20. Higgins JA, Hirsch JS, Trussell J. Pleasure, prophylaxis, and procreation: A qualitative analysis of intermittent contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40:130–137

PII: S0010-7824(08)00577-5

doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.008

Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 6 , Pages 407-410 , June 2009