« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 6
, Pages 407-410
, June 2009
Better than nothing or savvy risk-reduction practice? The importance of withdrawal
References
- . Withdrawal: “A very great deal better than nothing.". Canadian J Hum Sex. 2003;12:189–190
- . Contraceptive technology. 19th ed.. New York (NY): Ardent Media; 2007;
- . Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception. 2008;77:10–21
- . Withdrawal: a review of the literature and an agenda for research. Stud Fam Plann. 1995;26:140–153
- . The determinants of withdrawal use in Turkey: a husband's imposition or a woman's choice?. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1019–1033
- . Family planning in the Jewish population of Israel: correlates of withdrawal use. Stud Fam Plann. 1997;28:215–227
- . Ethnic Chinese women's perceptions about condoms, withdrawal and rhythm methods of birth control. Contraception. 2004;69:493–496
- . Coitus interruptus and the control of natural fertility. Population Stud. 1995;49:19–43
- . Coitus interruptus in the twentieth century. Population Devel Rev. 1993;19:767–792
- . Does preejaculatory penile secretion originating from Cowper's gland contain sperm?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:157–159
- . Pre-ejaculatory fluid as potential vector for sexual transmission of HIV-1. Lancet. 1992;340:1470
- Detection of HIV-1 DNA sequences in pre-ejaculatory fluid. Lancet. 1992;340:1469
- . Traditional methods. In: Potts M, Diggory P editor. Textbook of Contraceptive Practice. 2nd ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983;p. 74–83
- . Why withdrawal? Why not withdrawal? Men's perspectives. Reprod Health Matters. 2005;13:164–173
- . Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States, 1982–2002. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no 350. Hyattsville (Md): National Center for Health Statistics; 2004;
- . Coitus-dependent family planning methods: observations from Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann. 1999;30:43–53
- . Relationships between contraceptive method and sexual pleasure and satisfaction: results from the Women's Wellbeing and Sexuality Study. Sexual Health. 2008;5:321–330
- . Sexual needs, control, and refusal: examples of how “doing” class and gender influences sexual risk taking. J Sex Res. 2008;45:233–245
- . Pleasure and power: Incorporating sexuality, agency, and inequality into research on contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1803–1813
- . Pleasure, prophylaxis, and procreation: A qualitative analysis of intermittent contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40:130–137
PII: S0010-7824(08)00577-5
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.008
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 79, Issue 6
, Pages 407-410
, June 2009
