Contraception
Volume 80, Issue 6 , Pages 578-582, December 2009

Impact of paracervical block on postabortion pain in patients undergoing abortion under general anesthesia

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Hawaii John A Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96821, USA

Received 3 February 2009; received in revised form 15 May 2009; accepted 21 May 2009. published online 13 July 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Paracervical block is used as a way to decrease postoperative pain in patients having abortions under general anesthesia. To date, no studies have evaluated the efficacy of this practice.

Study Design

Patients were recruited from a university-based family planning clinic. Seventy-two patients seeking abortion under general anesthesia were enrolled into the single-blinded study. Thirty-nine patients were randomized to receive a paracervical block, and 33 were randomized to no local anesthesia. The patients completed a demographic survey and visual analog pain scales for pain prior to and at several time points after the procedure. Data regarding the need for additional pain medications postoperatively were recorded. Analysis of variance single factor and two-sample one-sided t test were used in data analysis.

Results

Experimental and control groups were similar in all measured demographic characteristics. They were also similar in gestational age, number of laminaria required, preoperative dilation, operative time, estimated blood loss and reported complications.

Postoperative pain was not significantly affected by placement of a paracervical block prior to abortion under general anesthesia. The need for postoperative pain medication during recovery was similar between groups.

Conclusion

This study does not support the hypothesized benefit of local anesthesia prior to surgical abortion under general anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain.

Keywords: Abortion, Paracervical block, General anesthesia, Abortion pain

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(09)00278-9

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.05.125

Contraception
Volume 80, Issue 6 , Pages 578-582, December 2009