« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 80, Issue 6
, Pages 578-582
, December 2009
Impact of paracervical block on postabortion pain in patients undergoing abortion under general anesthesia
References
- . Disparities in rate of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–96
- . Best practices in surgical abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:418–422
- . Abortion surveillance-United States, 2004. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007;56:1–33
- . The role and comparison of two techniques of paracervical block for pain relief during suction evacuation for first-trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception. 2004;70:159–163
- . Paracervical block and elective abortion: the effect on pain of waiting between injection and procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1304–1307
- . Control of pain for women undergoing abortion. Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1989;3:131–140
- . Pericervical block with vacuum aspiration. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1979;29:557–560
- . Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1267–1272
- . A double-blind randomized comparison of lidocaine and saline for cervical anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:600–604
- . Effect of deep injections of local anesthetics and basal dilatation of cervix in management of pain during legal abortions. A randomized, controlled study. Contraception. 1997;56:85–87
- . Pre-emptive analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:176–177
- . Pre-emptive analgesia and protective premedication. What is the difference?. Biomed Pharmacother. 2006;60:336–340
- . Paracervical block in incomplete abortion using manual vacuum aspiration: randomized clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5 Pt 1):943–951
- . A randomized comparison of different methods of analgesia in abortion using manual vacuum aspiration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99:91–94
- . A randomized trial of pain relief in termination of pregnancy in South Africa. Trop Doct. 2005;35:136–139
- . Surgical Abortion. Reno (NV): West End Women's Medical Group; 1998;
PII: S0010-7824(09)00278-9
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.05.125
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 80, Issue 6
, Pages 578-582
, December 2009
