Contraception
Volume 80, Issue 6 , Pages 512-518, December 2009

Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse perinatal outcomes — a national study

  • Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
    • School of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Ethel-Sherry Gordon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Information and Computer Services, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem 93480, Israel
  • ,
  • Ziona Haklai

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Information and Computer Services, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem 93480, Israel
  • ,
  • Arnon Samueloff

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
    • School of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
  • ,
  • Michael M. Schimmel

      Affiliations

    • School of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
    • Department of Neonatology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 91031, Israel

Received 11 February 2009; received in revised form 9 June 2009; accepted 9 June 2009. published online 23 July 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The interpregnancy interval (IPI) has been reported to influence the outcome of pregnancy and birth. We performed a national study in Israel to determine the impact of IPI on multiple adverse perinatal outcomes.

Study Design

This longitudinal cohort study used birth certificates of siblings born to the same biological mother, with at least one previous birth and a subsequent singleton pregnancy. Adverse pregnancy outcomes included preterm delivery, very preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), very SGA (VSGA), early neonatal death and major congenital malformations. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for each outcome.

Results

The study included 440,838 of a total of 846,845 reported live births in Israel over 5 years; excluded were primiparas (32%), multifetal births (4.9%) and those with incomplete data (10.9%). For IPIs shorter than 6 months, there were significantly increased risks for preterm birth (OR=1.23), SGA (OR=1.14), VSGA (OR=1.15), early neonatal death (OR=1.62) and congenital malformations (OR=1.14). Intervals of 60 months or longer had higher risks for preterm birth (OR=1.39) and VSGA (OR=1.16).

Conclusion

Optimal IPI recommendation of >11 months is an accessible and low-cost means to improve multiple adverse perinatal outcomes.

Keywords: Interpregnancy interval, Preterm delivery, Small for gestational age, Early neonatal death, Major congenital malformations

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(09)00308-4

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.06.006

Contraception
Volume 80, Issue 6 , Pages 512-518, December 2009