Contraception
Volume 80, Issue 6 , Pages 555-560, December 2009

Use of injectable progestin contraception and risk of STI among South African women

  • Audrey Pettifor

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Fax: +1 919 966 2089.
  • ,
  • Sinead Delany

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Health and HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • ,
  • Immo Kleinschmidt

      Affiliations

    • Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
  • ,
  • William C. Miller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA
  • ,
  • Julius Atashili

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA
  • ,
  • Helen Rees

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Health and HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Received 21 May 2008; received in revised form 2 December 2008; accepted 9 June 2009. published online 17 July 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

This study was conducted to determine the association between the use of injectable progestin contraception (IPC) and the risk of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), bacterial vaginosis (BV) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) among women in South Africa.

Methods

From August 1999 through May 2001, 643 HIV-1-negative women were recruited from family planning clinics in Orange Farm, South Africa. IPC [norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA)] users and nonhormonal contraception users were recruited in approximately equal numbers. Eligible participants were seen at enrolment and on four follow-up visits over a 12-month period; 567 returned for at least one follow-up visit. Multivariable Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to compute the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for infections with GC, CT, BV and TV by use of NET-EN or DMPA relative to nonuse during follow-up.

Results

In multivariable models, the use of DMPA slightly increased the risk of infection with CT [IRR=1.24; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=0.80–1.94] and GC (IRR=1.30; 95% CI=0.58–2.98), although these associations were not statistically significant. In contrast, DMPA appeared to be protective for TV (IRR=0.35; 95% CI=0.12–1.01), although this estimate was very imprecise. The use of both DMPA and NET-EN was associated with a decreased risk of BV.

Conclusions

The use of DMPA among women in this study population was associated with an increased — but not statistically significant — risk of cervical infection with chlamydia and gonorrhea, and a decreased risk of TV and BV. Given the inconsistencies and limitations of the data describing an increased risk of CT and GC with IPC use, the potential risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) must be balanced against the risk of unintended pregnancy and its health consequences, especially in developing countries. Women opting to use IPC should be counseled to use condoms to protect against STIs and HIV.

Keywords: Contraception, South Africa, Sexually transmitted diseases, Progesterone, Women

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Pettifor's time was supported by the Developmental Awards Program of the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Sexually Transmitted Infections and Topical Microbicide Cooperative Research Centers (STI-TM CRC) grants to the University of Washington (AI 31448) and the University of North Carolina (AI 31496). The main study was funded through a grant from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

PII: S0010-7824(09)00309-6

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.06.007

Contraception
Volume 80, Issue 6 , Pages 555-560, December 2009