Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 1 , Pages 22-29, January 2010

Oral contraceptive discontinuation and its aftermath in 19 developing countries

  • Mohamed M. Ali

      Affiliations

    • Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, World Health Organization, Cairo P.O. Box 11371, Egypt
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +20 2 2276 5363.
  • ,
  • John Cleland

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1B, England, UK

Received 29 May 2009; received in revised form 10 June 2009; accepted 10 June 2009. published online 04 September 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The purpose of the article was to document oral contraceptive (OC) discontinuation and switching in a large number of low- and middle-income countries, and to assess the effects of women's education and reason for use (spacing vs. limitation). An attempt was made to explain intercountry variations.

Study Design

Calendar data from 19 Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 1999 and 2005 were used. Data were analyzed by single- and multiple-decrement life tables and by Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

The probability of stopping OC use within 12 months for reasons that implied dissatisfaction with the method ranged from 15% in Indonesia to over 40% in Bolivia and Peru with a median value of 28%. On average, 35% switched to a modern method within 3 months and 16% to a less effective ‘traditional’ method. Both education and reason for use were strongly related to the probability of switching to a modern method. Discontinuation was lower and switching higher in countries judged to have strong family planning programs.

Conclusions

Both discontinuation of use and inadequate switching to alternative methods are major but neglected problems in the family planning services of many developing countries.

Keywords: Oral contraception, Discontinuation, Switching, Survey, Developing countries

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The views expressed in the article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of WHO.

PII: S0010-7824(09)00310-2

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.06.009

Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 1 , Pages 22-29, January 2010