Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 223-225 (March 2010)


View previous. 10 of 18 View next.

Extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring: evaluation of clinical aspects

Fernando Augusto Barreirosab, Cristina Aparecida Falbo GuazzelliaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ricardo Barbosab, Francisco de Assisb, Fábio Fernando de Araújoa

Received 25 August 2009; received in revised form 30 September 2009; accepted 14 October 2009. published online 16 November 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Oral contraceptives used for extended periods of time have been extensively studied because of their potential benefits; however, there have been few publications on extended regimens of vaginal contraceptive rings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical symptoms, body weight and blood pressure changes in women using the vaginal ring continuously over a 1-year period.

Study Design

This prospective cohort evaluated clinical aspects (dysmenorrhea, headache, breast tenderness, leg pain and irritability), body weight and blood pressure changes in 75 women (18–37 years of age) using a vaginal ring releasing 120 mcg of etonogestrel and 15 mcg of ethinyl estradiol daily, over a continuous period of 84 days, followed by a 7-day ring-free interval, during 1 year. The chi-square, Wilcoxon and paired t tests were used to analyze differences in the outcomes of interest.

Results

Compared to pre-enrollment status, at the end of the study period, the patients reported significantly less dysmenorrhea and irritability, a nonsignificant decrease in breast tenderness, leg pain and headaches. Blood pressure measurements remained unchanged. Although weight and body mass index increased significantly among users, they remained within the expected biological variation range.

Conclusion

The vaginal ring used on an extended regimen is a well-tolerated contraceptive method and also offers noncontraceptive benefits.

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sao Paulo Federal University Family Planning Clinic (UNIFESP), 1767 São Paulo, Brazil

b Western Paulista University, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +55 11 55722605; fax: +55 11 55722605.

 There was no funding for this study.

PII: S0010-7824(09)00453-3

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.10.007


View previous. 10 of 18 View next.

Advertisement