« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 3
, Pages 197-201
, March 2010
Sino-implant (II) — a levonorgestrel-releasing two-rod implant: systematic review of the randomized controlled trials
References
- . Sino-Implant (II): 2008 Quality assurance evaluation. http://www.infoforhealth.org/implants/sinoimplantqualityeval.pdf(accessed September 28, 2009)
- . Forgettable contraception. Contraception. 2009;80:497–499
- . Assessment of a disposable trocar for insertion of contraceptive implants. Contraception. 2010;81:140–142
- . Global summary of shipments report. Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition. http://rhi.rhsupplies.org/rhi/index.do?locale=en_US(accessed June 4, 2009)
- A multicentre study of CLa implant and Sino-Implant — expanded application (two-year follow-up). J Reprod Contracept. 1997;8:101–110
- . Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.0. [updated Feb 2008]. Available from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org2008;
- A multicenter comparative clinical study of Sino-levonorgestrel-releasing implants — No. I and II with Norplant. J Reprod Contracept. 2004;15:101–107
- . Multicenter clinical study of two Sino-subdermal implants. Chinese J Fam Plann. 2002;79:87–95
- A multicenter comparative clinical study of two types of Sino-implant. Chinese J Fam Plann. 2002;79:96–104
- Comparative clinical study of Sino-Implant — a levonorgestrel subdermal implant versus Norplant based on four-year observation of 666 cases. J Reprod Contracept. 1998;18:290–294
- . A five-year multi-center observation of three subdermal implants. Guangdong Med J. 2003;24:166–167
- . A five-year comparative clinical study of Chinese No. II implant with Norplant. Chinese J Med. 2002;37:45–46
- . A four-year follow-up observation of Chinese implant for 1000 cases. Suzhou Univer J Med Sci. 2006;26:612–613
- . Five-year clinical observation of China-made Type-II subcutaneous implant. J Reprod Contracept. 2007;27:80–84
- . A clinical evaluation of long-acting China-made subdermal implants. Jiangsu Med J. 1996;22:796
- . The safety of Sino-implant — three-year clinical observation. J Reprod Contracept. 1999;10:234–241
- A six-year observation of clinical application of China-made type II levonorgestrel subdermal implant (Sino-implant). Chinese J Fam Plann. 2000;2:117–122
- . Clinical analysis of 1,000 married women with subdermal implants. J Med Theory Prac. 2007;20:1442
- . Seven-year observation of effectiveness of China-made type II subdermal implant. Chinese Med Res Clin. 2004;2:111–116
- . A global handbook for providers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007;
- . A five-year observation of clinical application of China-made Type II contraceptive subcutaneous implant. Chinese J Fam Plann. 2002;10:282–286
- . Post-marketing surveillance of Norplant contraceptive implants: I. Contraceptive efficacy and reproductive health. Contraception. 2001;63:167–186
- . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–1194
- . Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008;29:727–731
- . Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?. Trials. 2009;10:46
- . Statistical reporting in Chinese biomedical journals. Lancet. 2009;373:2091–2093
☆ FHI is the recipient of grant funding to provide quality testing of Sino-Implant (II) independent of Shanghai Dahua Pharmaceuticals' own QA/QC tests [1], to assist Dahua in identifying distribution partners and to provide technical assistance to distributors in the registration and introduction of the product. Distributors of the product provide a preferential price to the public sector. Dr. Steiner is part of a consulting firm facilitating regulatory approval and product testing of other reproductive health products. Dr. Grimes has consulted with Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Schering-Plough, two manufacturers of contraceptive implants.
☆☆ Support for this research was provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of FHI, the World Health Organization or the funding agency.
PII: S0010-7824(09)00484-3
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.10.013
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 3
, Pages 197-201
, March 2010
