Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 81, Issue 5, Pages 446-451 (May 2010)


View previous. 15 of 17 View next.

Delays in request for pregnancy termination: comparison of patients in the first and second trimesters

Jessica W. KileyaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Lynn M. Yeeb, Cassandra M. Niemic, Joseph M. Feinglassd, Melissa A. Simona

Received 16 September 2009; received in revised form 16 December 2009; accepted 27 December 2009. published online 11 February 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Despite the availability of first trimester abortion services in urban settings, many women request abortion in the second trimester. We identified protective and risk factors associated with women who delay requesting abortions until the second trimester.

Study Design

The study was a cross-sectional survey of 247 patients requesting surgical abortion at an urban family planning clinic. Survey and medical records data were analyzed for associations between 18 risk factors and incidence of second trimester request.

Results

Thirty-two percent of subjects presented in the second trimester. Chi-square analyses revealed that first trimester participants were more often employed (p<.0001), privately insured (p=.01), or had previous abortions (p=.04). Second trimester patients were younger (p<.0001), more often primigravid (p=.04), experienced more difficulty financing the procedure (p<.0001) and finding a surgeon (p<.0001), traveled longer distances (p=.005), and more often feared the procedure (p=.03). Using multiple logistic regression, women requesting second trimester abortions were more likely to report: obstacles financing the abortion (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.28–4.28); traveling long distances (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.31-6.31); and fear (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.17–5.17). These women were less often employed outside the home (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.64).

Conclusions

Physicians and advocates must strive to reduce abortion costs, increase access to trained surgeons, and allay women's fears of abortion procedures.

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

b Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

c University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

d Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 312 695 8486; fax: +1 312 695 8711.

PII: S0010-7824(09)00559-9

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.021


View previous. 15 of 17 View next.

Advertisement