Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 5 , Pages 446-451 , May 2010

Delays in request for pregnancy termination: comparison of patients in the first and second trimesters

  • Jessica W. Kiley

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 312 695 8486; fax: +1 312 695 8711.
  • ,
  • Lynn M. Yee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
  • ,
  • Cassandra M. Niemi

      Affiliations

    • University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  • ,
  • Joseph M. Feinglass

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
  • ,
  • Melissa A. Simon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

Received 16 September 2009 ,Revised 16 December 2009 ,Accepted 27 December 2009.

References 

  1. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–96
  2. Jones RK, Zolna MR, Henshaw SK, Finer LB. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40:6–16
  3. Lawson HW, Frye A, Atrash HK, Smith JC, Shulman HB, Ramick M. Abortion mortality, United States, 1972 through 1987. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1365–1372
  4. Koonin LM, Strauss LT, Chrisman CE, Parker WY. Abortion surveillance–United States, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;49:1–43
  5. Bartlett LA, Berg CJ, Shulman HB, et al. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:729–737
  6. Drey EA, Foster DG, Jackson RA, Lee SJ, Cardenas LH, Darney PD. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:128–135
  7. Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception. 2006;74:334–344
  8. Foster DG, Jackson RA, Cosby K, Weitz TA, Darney PD, Drey EA. Predictors of delay in each step leading to an abortion. Contraception. 2008;77:289–293
  9. Harper CC, Henderson JT, Darney PD. Abortion in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:501–512
  10. Steinauer J, Landy U, Filippone H, Laube D, Darney PD, Jackson RA. Predictors of abortion provision among practicing obstetrician-gynecologists: a national survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:39.e1–39.e6
  11. Charles VE, Polis CB, Sridhara SK, Blum RW. Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence. Contraception. 2008;78:436–450
  12. Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE. Psychological factors in abortion. A review. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1194–1204
  13. Adler NE. Abortion and the null hypothesis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:785–786
  14. Steinberg JR, Jordan B, Wells ES. Science prevails: abortion and mental health. Contraception. 2009;79:81–83
  15. Jones RK, Darroch JE, Henshaw SK. Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000-2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;34:226–235

PII: S0010-7824(09)00559-9

doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.021

Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 5 , Pages 446-451 , May 2010