Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 6 , Pages 515-519, June 2010

Length of the endometrial cavity as measured by uterine sounding and ultrasonography in women of different parities

Human Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences and National Institute of Hormones and Women's Health, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 13084-971, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Received 19 October 2009; received in revised form 5 January 2010; accepted 8 January 2010. published online 02 March 2010.

Abstract 

Background

In view of current controversies regarding the need for new, shorter intrauterine devices (IUDs) that would reduce expulsion rates in nulligravida, endometrial cavity length was measured in women of different parities using uterine sounding and ultrasonography.

Study Design

A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed including 570 women of 17–52 years of age, 260 of whom were nulligravida and 310 parous.

Results

The difference in mean length between measurements taken by uterine sounding and ultrasonography was 0.28 cm. Mean endometrial cavity length was 3.84±0.03 cm (mean±S.E.M.) in nulligravida and 4.25±0.03 cm in parous women according to uterine sounding (p<.001) and 3.70±0.03 cm and 3.84±0.03 cm, respectively, according to ultrasonography (p=.006).

Conclusions

By either technique, mean length of the endometrial cavity was >3.6 cm, the length of the most common IUDs, the TCu380A and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Therefore, the issue appears controversial for developing new, shorter IUDs, since current models fit most women, including nulligravida, albeit one third of the women of our sample showed endometrial length shorter than 3.2 cm.

Keywords: Endometrial length, Nulligravida women, Parous women, Intrauterine device

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-7824(10)00007-7

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.006

Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 6 , Pages 515-519, June 2010