Contraception
Volume 82, Issue 1 , Pages 56-63, July 2010

Use of contraceptive methods among women with endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review

Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, USA

Received 1 February 2010; accepted 2 February 2010. published online 19 March 2010.

Abstract 

Background

The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for the safety of contraceptive use among women with endometrial hyperplasia.

Study Design

We searched the PubMed database for peer-reviewed articles published in any language from database inception through February 2009 concerning the safety of using any contraceptive method among women diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia. We excluded case reports but included all other study designs. The quality of each individual piece of evidence was assessed using the United States Preventive Services Task Force grading system.

Results

We identified nine articles that met the criteria for review. Each study examined levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs); no studies were identified that examined other contraceptive methods. Overall, these studies suggest that LNG-IUD use is not associated with adverse health events among women diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia. Disease regression with LNG-IUD use was observed in all women in seven studies, in 90% of women in one study, and in 67% of women in one study. Limitations of the studies include small sample sizes and lack of a comparison group or nonrandomized assignment to LNG-IUD.

Conclusions

There is fair quality evidence indicating that use of the LNG-IUD is safe for women with endometrial hyperplasia and may have therapeutic benefits.

Keywords: Contraceptives, Endometrial hyperplasia, Systematic review

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

PII: S0010-7824(10)00049-1

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.005

Contraception
Volume 82, Issue 1 , Pages 56-63, July 2010