« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 6
, Pages 457-459
, June 2010
Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy
References
- . Prevalence, incidence and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice; 1998;
- . Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. JAMA. 2001;286:572–579
- . When will adolescents tell someone about dating violence victimization?. Violence Against Women. 2008;14:741–758
- . Intimate partner violence and health care-seeking patterns among female users of urban adolescent clinics. Matern Child Health J. 2009;2009 Sep 17 [Epub ahead of print]
- . The relationship among demographics, reproductive characteristics, and intimate partner violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1002–1007
- . Power over parity: intimate partner violence and issues of fertility control. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(7):148.e1–148.e7
- . The prevalence rates of domestic abuse in women attending a family planning clinic. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2004;30:113–114
- . Help-seeking for intimate partner violence and forced sex in South Carolina. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:316–320
- . Mexican and Mexican American women in a battered women's shelter: barriers to condom negotiation for HIV/AIDS prevention. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1999;20:333–355
- . Dating violence and sexually transmitted disease/HIV testing and diagnosis among adolescent females. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e272–e276
- . Domestic violence. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:886–892
- Partner violence and sexual HIV-risk behaviors among women in an inner-city emergency department. Violence Vict. 1998;13:377–393
- . Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions. Matern Child Health J. 2000;4:79–84
- Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse.. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:302–307
- . The relationship between sexual abuse and sexual risk among high school students: findings from the 1997 Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Matern Child Health J. 2000;4:125–134
- . Gender differences in risk behaviors associated with forced or pressured sex. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:57–63
- . Association of intimate partner physical and sexual violence with unintended pregnancy among pregnant women in Peru. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;100:104–108
- . Intimate partner violence and unplanned pregnancy in the Pacific Islands Families Study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;100:109–115
- . The relationship between intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy: analysis of a national sample from Colombia. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2004;30:165–173
- . Intimate partner violence and unwanted pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth among a national sample of Bangladeshi women. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;114:1246–1252
- . Domestic violence, contraceptive use, and unwanted pregnancy in Rural India. Stud Fam Plan. 2008;39:177–186
- . The effects of an abusive primary partner on the condom use and sexual negotiation practices of African-American women. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1016–1018
- Center for Impact Research. Domestic violence and birth control sabotage: a report from the Teen Parent Project: Teen Parent Project; 2000. Available at: http://www.impactresearch.org/documents/dvandbirthcontrol.pdf
- Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81:316–322
- . Male pregnancy promoting behaviors and adolescent partner violence: findings from a qualitative study with adolescent females. Ambul Pediatr. 2007;7:360–366
- Moore L, Frohwirth L, Miller E. Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States. Soc Sci Med [in press].
- . Reproductive health services and intimate partner violence: shaping a pragmatic response in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int Fam Plan Perspec. 2004;30:207–213
☆ This commentary was produced with funding support from National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21 HD057814-02 to Miller and Silverman), UC Davis Health System Research Award to Miller and Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health award to Miller (BIRCWH, K12 HD051958; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Office of Research on Women's Health, Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institute of Aging).
PII: S0010-7824(10)00089-2
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.023
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Contraception
Volume 81, Issue 6
, Pages 457-459
, June 2010
