Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Obstetrician–gynecologist physicians' beliefs about emergency contraception: a national survey

Ryan E. LawrenceaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Kenneth A. Rasinskib, John D. Yooncd, Farr A. Curlinbd

Received 2 April 2010; received in revised form 27 April 2010; accepted 29 April 2010. published online 20 July 2010.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Background

Although emergency contraception (EC) is available without a prescription, women still rely on doctors' advice about its safety and effectiveness. Yet little is known about doctors' beliefs and practices in this area.

Study Design

We surveyed 1800 US obstetrician–gynecologists. Criterion variables were doctors' beliefs about EC's effects on pregnancy rates, and patients' sexual practices. We also asked which women are offered EC. Predictors were demographic, clinical and religious characteristics.

Results

Response rate was 66% (1154/1760). Most (89%) believe EC access lowers unintended pregnancy rates. Some believe women use other contraceptives less (27%), initiate sex at younger ages (12%) and have more sexual partners (15%). Half of physicians offer EC to all women (51%), while others offer it never (6%) or only after sexual assault (6%). Physicians critical of EC, males and religious physicians were more likely to offer it never or only after sexual assault (odds ratios 2.1–12).

Conclusion

Gender, religion and divergent beliefs about EC's effects shape physicians' beliefs and practices.

a Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

b Section of General Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

c Section of Hospital Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

d The MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

 Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Greenwall Foundation, the John Templeton Foundation and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (1 K23 AT002749, to Farr Curlin). Funding agencies did not participate in study design, data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, writing or submission.

PII: S0010-7824(10)00316-1

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.151

Advertisement