Contraception
Volume 82, Issue 6 , Pages 491-496, December 2010

Effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on cervical mucus quality and sperm penetrability

LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA

Received 16 April 2010; received in revised form 2 June 2010; accepted 7 June 2010. published online 23 July 2010.

Abstract 

Background

In levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) users, the prevention of sperm penetration through cervical mucus has not been demonstrated.

Study Design

Subjects were enrolled in an investigator-blinded study to compare quality and sperm penetrability of mid-cycle cervical mucus between LNG-IUS users and hormone-free controls. Cervical mucus was microscopically examined using World Health Organization (WHO) cervical mucus analysis (CMA). CMA score ≥10 of 15 points indicated cervical mucus favoring sperm penetration. Mucus was incubated with sperm using the WHO simplified slide test (SST) and Kremer sperm cervical mucus penetration test (SCMPT).

Results

Data from 14 LNG-IUS users and 16 controls showed 14% of LNG-IUS users had CMA score ≥10% vs. 69% of controls (p=.004). SST showed no sperm penetration for LNG-IUS users, significantly less than controls (0% vs. 64.3%, p<.001). SCMPT demonstrated no sperm mucus penetration for LNG-IUS users at 2 and 6 h (0% vs. 85% in controls with 2-h score ≥6, p<.001; 6 h 0% vs. 79% in controls, p<.001).

Conclusions

Mid-cycle cervical mucus of LNG-IUS users is poor quality and prevents endocervical sperm transport in vitro.

Keywords: Contraceptive mechanism, Fertilization, Intrauterine device, Kremer Test, Sperm-cervical mucus Interaction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was presented orally as a Scientific Prize Paper Candidate and recipient of the Researcher In-Training Award at the 65th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in Atlanta, GA, USA, on October 21, 2009. The study was funded through an educational grant from an anonymous donor. The sponsor had no role in study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation or report writing.

PII: S0010-7824(10)00359-8

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.006

Contraception
Volume 82, Issue 6 , Pages 491-496, December 2010