Advertisement

Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: A randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day device

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      IUDs releasing 20 mcg/day of levonorgestrel (LNg20) were in randomized trial together with the Copper T, model TCu 380Ag, in seven centers involving 2244 women. Two-year (25 months) gross cumulative pregnancy rates were 0.2 ± 0.2 and 0.9 ± 0.3 for the levonorgestrel and copper releasing devices, respectively (P > 0.05). There were no ectopic pregnancies in more than 1600 woman-years of use of each device. Removal rates for bleeding and/or pain or for medical reasons other than menstrual problems did not differ significantly between devices. Oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea prompted 10.7 per hundred (gross rate, 8.4 net rate) women using the LNg 20 IUD to request removal in the two-year period, significantly above the 0.2 per hundred rate among women with the Copper IUD (P < 0.001). At the end of two years an estimated 59.4 per 100 women were continuing use of the LNg 20 IUD, and 67.5 per 100 (P < 0.001) with the TCu 380Ag. This difference is almost wholly ascribable to a marked reduction in bleeding episodes and days among women using the LNg 20 device with concomitant removal of device. Hemoglobin rose an average of 0.5g/dl (P < 0.001) for this group whereas women using the TCu 380Ag experienced a decline of 0.2g/dl compared with baseline values (P < 0.001).
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • World Health Organization Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for Fertility Regulation
        Interval IUD insertion in parous women: A randomized multicentre comparative trial of the Lippes loop D, the TCu 220 and the Copper 7.
        Contraception. 1982; 26: 1-22
        • Sivin I.
        • Stern J.
        Long-acting, more effective Copper T IUDs: A summary of U.S. experience, 1970–1975.
        Stud. Fam. Plann. 1979; 10: 263-281
        • Diaz J.
        • Diaz M.
        • Pastene L.
        • Araki R.
        • Faundes A.
        Randomized clinical study of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop C in Campinas, Brazil.
        Contraception. 1982; 26: 221-228
        • Sung S.
        • Qian L.-J.
        • Liu X.
        Comparative clinical experience with 3 IUDs, TCu 380Ag, TCu 220C and Mahua ring in Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
        Contraception. 1984; 29: 229-239
        • Roy S.
        • Casagrande J.
        • Cooper D.L.
        • Mishell D.R.
        Comparison of three different models of the Copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1979; 134: 568-574
        • Cole L.P.
        • Potts D.M.
        • Aranda C.
        • Behlilovic B.
        • Etman E.-S.
        • Moreno J.
        • Randic L.
        An evaluation of the TCu 380Ag and the Multiload Cu 375.
        Fertil. Steril. 1985; 43: 214-217
        • World Health Organization, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction
        Intrauterine devices.
        13th Annual Report. 1984; : 52-57
        • Sung S.
        • Qian L.-J.
        • Liu X.
        Two-year comparative clinical experience with three IUDs in China.
        in: Zatuchni G.J. Goldsmith A. Sciarra J.J. Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects. Harper and Row, Philadelphia1985: 109-114
        • Israel R.
        • Shaw S.T.
        • Martin M.A.
        Comparative quantitation of MBL with the Lippes Loop, Dalkon Shield and Copper-T IUDs.
        Contraception. 1974; 10: 63-71
        • Guillebaud J.
        • Bonnar J.
        Longer though lighter menstrual and intermenstrual bleeding with copper as compared to inert intrauterine devices.
        Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1978; 85: 707-712
        • Gallegos A.
        • Aznar R.
        • Merino G.
        • Guizer E.
        Intrauterine devices and menstrual blood loss. A comparative study of eight devices during the first six months of use.
        Contraception. 1978; 17: 153-161
        • Zador G.
        • Nilsson B.A.
        • Nilsson B.
        • Sjöberg N.-O.
        • Weström L.
        • Wiese J.
        Clinical experience with the uterine progesterone system (ProgestasertR).
        Contraception. 1976; 13: 559-568
        • Nilsson C.G.
        • Luukkainen T.
        Improvement of a d-norgestrel-releasing IUD.
        Contraception. 1977; 15: 295-306
        • El-Mahgoub S.
        d-Norgestrel slow releasing T device as an intrauterine contraceptive.
        in: Hefnawi F. Segal S.J. Analysis of Intrauterine Contraception. American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc.,, New York1975: 317-324
        • Nilsson C.G.
        • Lähteenmäki P.
        • Luukkainen T.
        Patterns of ovulation and bleeding with a low levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device.
        Contraception. 1980; 21: 155-164
        • Luukkainen T.
        • Allonen H.
        • Haukkamaa M.
        • Lähteenmäki P.
        • Nilsson C.G.
        • Toivonen J.
        Five years experience with levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs.
        Contraception. 1986; 33: 139-148
        • Grady W.R.
        • Hayward M.D.
        • Yagi J.
        Contraceptive failure in the United States: Estimates from the 1982 national survey of family growth.
        Fam. Plann. Perspect. 1986; 18: 200-209
        • Tietze C.
        • Lewit S.
        Evaluation of intrauterine devices: Ninth progress report of the Cooperative Statistical Program.
        Stud. Fam. Plann. 1970; 55: 1-40
        • Vessey M.
        • Yeates D.
        • Flavel R.
        Risk of ectopic pregnancy and duration of use of an intrauterine device.
        Lancet. 1979; 2: 501
        • Sivin I.
        IUD-associated ectopic pregnancies, 1974 to 1984.
        in: Zatuchni G.I. Goldsmith A. Sciarra J.J. Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects. Harper and Row, Philadelphia1985: 340-353
        • Sivin I.
        • Alvarez F.
        • Diaz J.
        • Diaz S.
        • Mahgoub S.El
        • Coutinho E.
        • Brache V.
        • Diaz M.M.
        • Faundes A.
        • Pavez M.
        • Mattos C.E.R.
        • Stern J.
        Intrauterine contraception with copper and with levonorgestrel: A randomized study of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
        Contraception. 1984; 30: 443-456