Research Article| Volume 49, ISSUE 2, P171-183, February 1994

Introducing the low-dose pill to Bangladesh; issues of continuation and failure

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      In response to government plans to introduce a low-dose pill to the national family planning program of Bangladesh, a comparison of the performance of low-dose and standard-dose pills among a rural Bangladeshi population was conducted. Continuation rates were found to be better among users of the low-dose pill and there was no evidence that failure rates were higher. The relative risk (standard-dose vs. low-dose) over the first 30 months following adoption was 1.25 for first method continuation, and 1.29 for extended use failure. This paper, thus, provides evidence that low-dose pills may be a suitable method of contraception for rural Bangladeshi women.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Mitra SN
        • Lerman C
        • Islam S
        Bangladesh Contraceptive Prevalence Survey 1991 Key Findings.
        Mitra and Associates,, Dhaka1992
        • Allen HH
        Clinical assessment of low dose oestrogens, low dose progestogen combined oral contraceptives.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1981; 60: 579-583
        • Chowdhury V
        • Joshi UM
        • Gopalkrishna K
        • Betrabet S
        • Saxena BN
        Escape ovulation in women due to the missing of low-dose combination oral contraceptive pills.
        Contraception. 1980; 22: 241-247
      1. Population Information Program. Population Reports A-7: Lower Dose Pills. Johns Hopkins University,, 1988
        • Mishell DR
        • Brenner P
        • Spellacy WA
        Dialogue two. Safety and effectiveness of low-dose oral contraceptives.
        J Reprod Med. 1982; 27: 251-273
        • Dionne P
        • Vickerson F
        A double-blind comparison of two oral contraceptives containing 50 micrograms and 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol.
        Current Therapeutic Research: Clinical and Experimental. 1974; 16: 281-288
        • Behilovic B
        • Rowan AJ
        A comparative study of Norinyl Math Eq versus Norinyl Math Eq in Belgrade, Yugoslavia.
        Contraception. 1987; 36: 515-526
        • Bairagi R
        A comparative study of regular and low-dose oral contraceptive in rural Bangladesh.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1980; 18: 264-267
        • Fraser IS
        • Jansen RPS
        Why do inadvertent pregnancies occur in oral contraceptive users? Effectiveness of oral contraceptive regimens and interfering factors.
        Contraception. 1983; 27: 531-551
        • Potter L
        • Wright S
        • Berrio D
        • Suarez P
        • Pinedo R
        • Castaneda Z
        Oral contraceptive compliance in rural Colombia: Knowledge of users and providers.
        Int Fam Plann Pers. 1988; 14: 27-31
        • Talwar PP
        • Berger GS
        The relation of body weight to side-effects associated with oral contraceptives.
        Br Med J. 1977; 1: 1637
        • Trussell J
        Methodological pitfalls in the analysis of contraceptive failure.
        Stat Med. 1991; 10: 201-220
        • Larson A
        • Mitra SN
        Pill Use in Bangladesh: Compliance, Continuation and Unintentional Pregnancies.
        in: Report of the 1990 Pill Use Study. Mitra and Associates,, Dhaka1991