Research Article| Volume 49, ISSUE 1, P56-72, January 1994

Download started.


Levonorgestrel-releasing and copper-releasing (Nova T) IUDs during five years of use: A randomized comparative trial

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      A 20 micrograms/24 hours levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device (LNG-IUD) has, in an open randomized multicenter study, been compared to the copper-releasing device Nova T during 5 years of use; 1821 women had the LNG-IUD and 937 women had the Nova T inserted. The 5-year cumulative gross pregnancy rate was 5.9 % for Nova T and 0.5% for the LNG-IUD. The local effect of levonorgestrel in the uterine cavity causes reduction of menstrual blood loss and development of oligo-amenorrhea, and the termination rates because of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual flow were significantly (P < 0.001) lower among LNG-IUD users. However, the gross termination rate because of amenorrhea was 6.0 in this group. Hb increased during use of the LNG-IUD and decreased during Nova T use, and the difference between the devices was statistically significant. The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) was low in LNG-IUD users regardless of age, whereas in the Nova T group, the PID rate was increased among the youngest women, which makes the difference between the devices significant (P < 0.01). The gross termination rate for reasons considered to be hormonal was 12.1 in the LNG-IUD group compared to 2.0 in the Nova T group (P < 0.001).
      The LNG-IUD is a long-acting reversible contraceptive method for 5 years with a pregnancy rate comparable to female sterilization. The incidence of PID is low even in young women. In addition, the positive health effects such as decreased menstrual blood loss and increased blood haemoglobin concentration make the LNG-IUD a favorable combination of hormonal and intrauterine contraception.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Pharriss BB
        • Ericksson R
        • Bashow J
        • Hoff S
        • Place VA
        • Zaffaroni A
        Progestasertr: A uterine therapeutic system for long-term contraception: Philosophy and clinical efficacy.
        Fertil Steril. 1974; 25: 915-921
        • Bergkvist A
        • Rybo G
        Treatment of menorrhagia with intrauterine release of progesterone.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983; 90: 255-258
        • Sivin I
        Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78: 291-298
        • Nilsson CG
        • Luukkainen T
        • Arko H
        Endometrial morphology of women using a d-norgestrel-releasing intrauterine device.
        Fertil Steril. 1978; 29: 397-401
        • Luukkainen T
        • Allonen H
        • Haukkamaa M
        • Lähteenmäki P
        • Nilsson CG
        • Toivonen J
        Five years' experience with levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs.
        Contraception. 1986; 33: 139-148
        • Sivin I
        • El Mahgoub S
        • McCarthy T
        • et al.
        Long-term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 meg/day (LNg 20) and the Copper T 380 Ag intrauterine devices: A five-year randomized study.
        Contraception. 1990; 42: 361-378
        • Wang SL
        • Wu SC
        • Xin XM
        • Chen JH
        • Gao J
        Three years' experience with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Norplant-2 implants: a randomized comparative study.
        Adv Contracep. 1992; 8: 105-114
        • Indian Council of Medical Research, Task force on IUD
        Randomized clinical trial with intrauterine devices, (levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG), CuT 380Ag, CuT 220C and CuT 200B. A 36-month study.
        Contraception. 1989; 39: 37-52
        • Luukkainen T
        • Allonen H
        • Haukkamaa M
        • et al.
        Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European multicenter study.
        Contraception. 1987; 36: 169-179
        • Toivonen J
        • Luukkainen T
        • Allonen H
        Protective effect of intrauterine release of levonorgestrel on pelvic infection: Three years comparative experience of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine devices.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77: 261-264
        • Luukkainen T
        • Allonen H
        • Nielsen NC
        • Nygren KG
        • Pyörälä T
        Five years experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T and the Copper-T-200.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 147: 885-892
        • Tietze C
        • Lewit S
        Recommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception.
        Stud Fam Plan. 1973; 4: 35-42
      1. BMDP Statistical Software, Inc; Version 1988, Version PC90. Los Angeles, CA, USA.

        • Silverberg SG
        • Haukkamaa M
        • Arko H
        • Nilsson CG
        • Luukkainen T
        Endometrial morphology during long-term use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices.
        Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1986; 5: 235-241
        • Nilsson CG
        • Lähteenmäki P
        • Luukkainen T
        Ovarian function in amenorrhoeic and menstruating users of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device.
        Fertil Steril. 1984; 41: 52-55
        • Barbosa I
        • Bakos O
        • Olsson SE
        • Odlind V
        • Johansson EDB
        Ovarian function during use of a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD.
        Contraception. 1990; 42: 51-66
        • Chick PM
        • Frances M
        • Paterson PJ
        A comprehensive review of female sterilization—tubal occlusion methods.
        Clin Reprod Fertil. 1985; 3: 81-97
        • Lindblom B
        • Thorburn J
        Läkartidningen. 1988; 11: 923-924
        • Nilsson CG
        Comparative quantitation of menstrual blood loss with a d-norgestrel-releasing IUD and a Nova-T copper device.
        Contraception. 1977; 15: 379-387
        • Scholten PC
        • van Eykeren Ma
        • Christiaens GCML
        • Haspels A
        Menstrual blood loss with levonorgestrel, Nova-T and Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices.
        in: Dissertation. University of Utrecht, Holland1989
        • Andersson K
        • Batar I
        • Rybo G
        Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-T.
        Contraception. 1992; 46: 575-584
        • Milsom I
        • Rybo G
        • Lindstedt G
        The influence of copper surface area on menstrual blood loss and iron status in women fitted with an IUD.
        Contraception. 1989; 41: 271-281
        • Andersson K
        • Rybo G
        Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of menorrhagia.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990; 97: 690-694