Advertisement

Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

      Abstract

      Context

      Fertility awareness-based (FAB) methods of family planning estimate the fertile days of the menstrual cycle whether by observing fertility signs such as cervical secretions and basal body temperature or by monitoring cycle days. The efficacy and acceptability of these methods are unclear.

      Methods

      We retrieved and analyzed all randomized controlled trials that examined any FAB method used for contraception.

      Results

      Because of poor methods and reporting, pregnancy rates could not be determined. A trial in Colombia found similar numbers of pregnancies among women randomized to the ovulation and symptothermal methods, but a trial in Los Angeles observed more pregnancies in the group assigned to the ovulation method. In the two American trials, recruitment of participants was unexpectedly difficult. Continuation rates were poor.

      Conclusion

      Despite intensive training and ongoing support, most participants in these trials discontinued prematurely. The comparative efficacy of these methods remains unknown. However, with the ovulation and symptothermal methods, pregnancies appear to be common; method continuation rates are low.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • World Health Organization
        Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use.
        3rd ed. 2005 ([accessed February 11, 2005])
        • International Planned Parenthood Federation
        Statement on periodic abstinence for family planning.
        International Planned Parenthood Federation, London (England)1995
        • Billings J.J.
        Natural family planning.
        Med J Aust. 1978; 2: 436
        • Pyper C.M.M.
        • Knight J.
        Fertility awareness methods of family planning: the physiological background, methodology and effectiveness of fertility awareness methods.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2001; 27: 103-110
        • Bonnar J.
        • Flynn A.
        • Freundl G.
        • Kirkman R.
        • Royston R.
        • Snowden R.
        Personal hormone monitoring for contraception.
        Br J Fam Plann. 1999; 24: 128-134
        • Freundl G.
        • Godehardt E.
        • Kern P.A.
        • Frank-Herrmann P.
        • Koubenec H.J.
        • Gnoth Ch.
        Estimated maximum failure rates of cycle monitors using daily conception probabilities in the menstrual cycle.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 2628-2633
        • Hughes J.
        Natural family planning: very risky business.
        Conscience. 1988; 9: 7-12
        • Neumann G.H.
        How natural is ���natural family planning���? Critical remarks from the biological behavior viewpoint.
        Gynakologe. 1989; 22 (in German): 1-6
        • Gray R.H.
        • Kambic R.T.
        Epidemiological studies of natural family planning.
        Hum Reprod. 1988; 3: 693-698
        • Population Reference Bureau
        Family planning worldwide. 2002 Data sheet.
        2002 ([accessed February 11, 2005])
        • Kass-Annese B.
        • Kennedy K.I.
        • Forrest K.
        • Danzer H.
        • Reading A.
        • Hughes H.
        A study of the vaginal contraceptive sponge used with and without the fertility awareness method.
        Contraception. 1989; 40: 701-714
        • Medina J.E.
        • Cifuentes A.
        • Abernathy J.R.
        • Spieler J.M.
        • Wade M.E.
        Comparative evaluation of two methods of natural family planning in Columbia.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 138: 1142-1147
        • Billings J.
        Natural family planning: the ovulation method.
        (2nd American edition) The Liturgical Press, Collegeville (Minn)1973
        • Thyma P.
        Fertile and infertile days in marriage life. Author's edition.
        Raritan Printing Company, Fall River (Mass)1973
        • Wade M.E.
        • McCarthy P.
        • Abernathy J.R.
        • et al.
        Randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning: an interim report.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 134: 628-631
        • Wade M.E.
        • McCarthy P.
        • Braunstein G.D.
        • et al.
        A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 141: 368-376
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Grimes D.A.
        Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward.
        Lancet. 2002; 359: 781-785
        • Moher D.
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Altman D.G.
        The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.
        Lancet. 2001; 357: 1191-1194
        • World Health Organization
        A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning: II. The effectiveness phase.
        Fertil Steril. 1981; 36: 591-598
        • Trussell J.
        Methodological pitfalls in the analysis of contraceptive failure.
        Stat Med. 1991; 10: 201-220
        • Ryder B.
        • Campbell H.
        Natural family planning in the 1990s.
        Lancet. 1995; 346: 233-234
        • World Health Organization
        A prospective multicenter trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning: V. Psychosexual aspects.
        Fertil Steril. 1987; 47: 765-772
        • d'Arcangues C.
        • Kennedy K.I.
        Periodic abstinence and calendar method use in Hungary, Peru, the Philippines, and Sri Lanka.
        Contraception. 2001; 64: 209-215
        • Trussell J.
        • Grummer-Strawn L.
        Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165: 2054-2059
        • Glasziou P.
        • Vandenbroucke J.P.
        • Chalmers I.
        Assessing the quality of research.
        BMJ. 2004; 328: 39-41