Advertisement

Factors influencing partners' involvement in women's contraceptive services

      Abstract

      Background

      Involving women's partners in family planning services may be one avenue by which rates of unplanned pregnancies can be reduced.

      Study Design

      In 2009, we surveyed a nationally representative sample of 2113 women aged 18���49 years receiving services from Title X family planning clinics in the United States about their contraceptive use and their current partner, including partners' past involvement in seeking and obtaining contraceptive services.

      Results

      More than half of the women in the sample (56%) indicated that their partners were at least partially involved in their contraceptive services. In the multivariable analysis, race/ethnicity, union status and relationship satisfaction were all significant predictors of partner involvement in contraceptive services. Women reporting that their partners interfere with their birth control were nearly twice as likely as women without interfering partners to report those partners being involved in their contraceptive services. Contraceptive use at last sex was not associated with partner involvement in contraceptive services in either bivariable or multivariable analyses.

      Conclusion

      In designing future couple-focused programs, clinics may need to focus on the interpersonal dynamics of couple-based decision-making and behaviors and tailor their programs given the characteristics of clients most likely to avail themselves of these services.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finer L.B.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
        • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        Healthy people 2010: reproductive health. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2001
        • Brown S.S.
        • Eisenberg L.
        The best intentions: unintended pregnancy and well-being of children and families.
        National Academy Press, Washington, DC1995
        • Sonenstein F.L.
        • Punja S.
        • Scarcella C.
        Future directions for family planning research: a framework for Title X family planning service delivery improvement research.
        Urban Institute, Washington, DC2004
        • Zolna M.
        • Lindberg L.D.
        • Frost J.
        Couples-based services in publicly funded family planning clinics: identifying the need.
        Guttmacher Institute, New York2011 (Available at http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/Couples-Services.pdf, accessed June 1, 2011)
        • Grady W.R.
        • Tanfer K.
        • Billy J.O.
        • Lincoln-Hanson J.
        Men's perceptions of their roles and responsibilities regarding sex, contraception and childrearing.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1996; 28: 221-226
        • Forste R.
        • Morgan J.
        How relationships of U.S. men affect contraceptive use and efforts to prevent sexually transmitted diseases.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1998; 30: 56-62
        • Frost J.J.
        • Darroch J.E.
        Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008; 40: 94-104
        • Severy L.J.
        • Silver S.E.
        Two reasonable people: joint decision-making in contraceptive choice and use.
        in: Severy L.J. Advances in population: psychosocial perspectives. Vol. 1. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London1994: 207-227
        • Grady W.R.
        • Klepinger D.H.
        • Billy J.O.
        • Cubbins L.A.
        The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception in the US.
        J Biosoc Sci. 2010; 42: 307-325
        • Guttmacher Institute
        Contraceptive needs and services, 2006.
        (Available at) (accessed Oct. 15, 2010)
        • StataCorp
        Stata statistical software: release 11.1.
        StataCorp LP, College Station (TX)2009
        • Fowler C.I.
        • Gable J.
        • Wang J.
        • Lyda-McDonald B.
        Family planning annual report: 2008 national summary.
        RTI International, Research Triangle Park (NC)2009
        • Becker S.
        • Robinson J.C.
        Reproductive health care: services oriented to couples.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998; 61: 275-281
        • Hart J.
        • Ross E.
        • Silva S.
        A collaborative evaluation of strategies to encourage couples-focused health service delivery in a sample of Title X-supported family planning clinics.
        Health Systems Research, Inc., Washington, DC2006
        • DuBard C.A.
        • Gizlice Z.
        Language spoken and differences in health status, access to care, and receipt of preventive services among US Hispanics.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98 (Epub 2008 Sep 17): 2021-2028
        • Marielena L.
        • Cristina G.
        • Kahramanian M.I.
        • Morales L.S.
        • Hayes-Bautista D.E.
        Acculturation and Latino health in the United States: a review of the literature and its sociopolitical context.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2005; 26: 367-397
        • Miller E.
        • Jordan B.
        • Levenson R.
        • Silverman J.G.
        Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy.
        Contraception. 2010; 81: 457-459
        • Kost K.
        • Singh S.
        • Vaughan B.
        • Trussell J.
        • Bankole A.
        Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.
        Contraception. 2008; 77: 10-21
        • Lindberg L.D.
        • Singh S.
        Sexual behavior of single adult American women.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008; 40: 27-33
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        • Schwarz E.B.
        Counseling about and use of emergency contraception in the United States.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008; 40: 81-86
        • Oakley D.
        • Bogue E.
        Quality of condom use as reported by female clients of a family planning clinic.
        Am J Public Health. 1995; 85: 1526-1530
        • Grady W.R.
        • Klepinger D.H.
        • Nelson-Wally A.
        Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1999; 31: 168-175
        • Blanc A.K.
        The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: an examination of the evidence.
        Stud Fam Plann. 2001; 32: 189-213
        • Cox S.
        • Posner S.
        • Sangi-Haghpeykar H.
        Who's responsible? Correlates of partner involvement in contraceptive decision making.
        Womens Health Issues. 2010; 20: 254-259
        • Kraft J.M.
        • Harvey S.M.
        • Hatfield-Timajchy K.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy motivations and contraceptive use: hers, his or theirs?.
        Womens Health Issues. 2010; 20: 234-241
        • Harvey S.M.
        • Bird S.T.
        • Galavotti C.
        • Duncan E.A.
        • Greenberg D.
        Relationship power, sexual decision making and condom use among women at risk for HIV/STDs.
        Women Health. 2002; 36: 69-84