Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 91, ISSUE 6, P513-519, June 2015

How does religious affiliation affect women's attitudes toward reproductive health policy? Implications for the Affordable Care Act

  • Elizabeth W. Patton
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, North Campus Research, Complex 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 10, Room G016, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800, USA. Tel.: +1-734-647-4844 (office); fax: +1-734-647-3301.
    Affiliations
    Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kelli Stidham Hall
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Vanessa K. Dalton
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Background

      Supreme Court cases challenging the Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandate for employer-provided reproductive health care have focused on religiously based opposition to coverage. Little is known about women's perspectives on such reproductive health policies.

      Study design

      Data were drawn from the Women's Health Care Experiences and Preferences survey, a randomly selected, nationally representative sample of 1078 US women aged 18–55 years. We examined associations between religious affiliation and attitudes toward employer-provided insurance coverage of contraception and abortion services as well as the exclusion of religious institutions from this coverage. We used chi-square and multivariable logistic regression for analysis.

      Results

      Respondents self-identified as Baptist (18%), Protestant (Other Mainline, 17%), Catholic (17%), Other Christian (20%), Religious, Non-Christian (7%) or No Affiliation (21%). Religious affiliation was associated with proportions of agreement for contraception (p=.03), abortion (p<.01) and religious exclusion (p<.01) policies. In multivariable models, differences in the odds of agreement varied across religious affiliations and frequency of service attendance. For example, compared to non-affiliated women, Baptists and Other Nondenominational Christians (but not Catholics) had lower odds of agreement with employer coverage of contraception (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.4–0.1 and OR 0.57, CI 0.4–0.9, respectively); women who attended services weekly or more than weekly had lower odds of agreement (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.3–0.8 and OR 0.33, CI 0.2–0.6, respectively), compared to less frequent attenders.

      Conclusions

      Recent religiously motivated legal challenges to employer-provided reproductive health care coverage may not represent the attitudes of many religious women.

      Implications

      Recent challenges to the ACA contraceptive mandate appear to equate religious belief with opposition to employer-sponsored reproductive health coverage, but women's views are more complex.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. (See for example)
        • Bronner E.
        A flood of suits on the coverage of birth control.
        New York Times. 2013: A1 ([http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/health/religious-groups-and-employers-battle-contraception-mandate.html?smid=pl-share, accessed September 30,2014])
        • Cohen I.G.
        • Lynch H.F.
        • Curfman G.D.
        When religious freedom clashes with access to care.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 361: 596-599
      2. (See for example)
        Brief of religious organizations as Amici Curiae supporting the government.
        (at) ([Accessed 12/20/2014])
      3. (See for example)
        • Jones R.K.
        • Dreweke J.
        Countering conventional wisdom: new evidence on religion and contraceptive use.
        Guttmacher Institute, New York2011 ([http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/Religion-and-Contraceptive-Use.pdf. Accessed 12/20/2014])
        • Moniz M.H.
        • Davis M.M.
        • Chang T.
        Attitudes about mandated coverage of birth control medication and other health benefits in a US national sample.
        JAMA. 2014; 311: 2539-2541
        • Hall K.S.
        • Fendrick A.M.
        • Zochowski M.
        • Dalton V.K.
        Women's health and the Affordable Care Act: high hopes versus harsh realities?.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: e10-e13
      4. (See for example)
        • Belluck P.
        • Echkholm E.
        Religious groups equate some contraceptives with abortion.
        New York Times. 2012 ([http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/17/health/religious-groups-equate-some-contraceptives-with-abortion.html, accessed September 30, 2014])
        • Lugo L.
        • Stencel S.
        • Green J.
        • Smith G.
        • Cox D.
        • Pond A.
        • et al.
        US religious landscape survey: religion, diverse and dynamic.
        Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.2008 ([http://www.pewforum.org/2008/02/01/chapter-3-religious-affiliation-and-demographic-groups/, accessed on May 17, 2014])
        • McCarthy M.
        Opposition to abortion is growing in Southern and Midwestern US states.
        BMJ. 2013; 347: f4915https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4915
        • Kramer M.R.
        • Hogue C.J.
        • Gaydos L.M.
        Noncontracepting behavior in women at risk for unintended pregnancy: what's religion got to do with it?.
        Ann Epidemiol. 2007; 17: 327-334
        • Cox D.
        • Jones R.
        • Navarro-Rivera J.
        I know what you did last Sunday: measuring social desirability bias in self-reported religious behavior, belief, and identity.
        Public Religion Research Institute, Washington, DC2014 ([http://publicreligion.org/research/2014/05/aapor-2014/, accessed September 30, 2014])