Advertisement

Evaluation of the Lady Free Biotester® in determining the fertile period

  • Richard J Fehring
    Correspondence
    Name and address for correspondence: Richard J. Fehring, RN, DNSc, Marquette University College of Nursing, Clark Hall, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881; Tel.: +1-414-288-3838; Fax: +1-414-288-1597
    Affiliations
    Marquette University College of Nursing, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nancy Gaska
    Affiliations
    Marquette University College of Nursing, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Small hand-held microscopes have been developed for self-observation of salivary ferning patterns to detect the fertile time of a woman’s menstrual cycle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate one such microscope, the Lady Free Biotester®, by comparing it with the self-observation of cervical-vaginal mucus and with the self-detection of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the urine. Twelve natural family planning teachers (average age 34.6 years) observed their cervical-vaginal mucus, tested their urine for LH, and observed salivary and cervical-vaginal mucus ferning patterns (with the Lady Free Biotester) for two menstrual cycles. Data indicated that there was a strong correlation between the LH in the urine and the peak in self-observed cervical-vaginal mucus ferning (r = 0.99, p ≤0.001) and salivary ferning (r = 0.98, p ≤0.001). However, it was difficult to assess the beginning and end of the fertile time based on the salivary ferning patterns. Further testing of salivary ferning patterns is recommended before widespread use of these devices for family planning.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fernando R.S
        • Regas J
        • Betz G
        Physiological mechanisms associated with ovulation prediction using the CUE Ovulation Predictor.
        Hum Reprod. 1988; 3: 413-417
        • Barbato M
        • Pandolfi A
        • Guida M
        A new diagnostic aid for natural family planning.
        Adv Contracept. 1993; 9: 335-340
        • Guida M
        • Barbato M
        • Bruno P
        • et al.
        Salivary ferning and the menstrual cycle in women.
        Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 20: 48-54
        • Corson G
        • Ghazi D
        • Kemmann E
        Home urinary luteinizing hormone immunoassay.
        Fertil Steril. 1990; 53: 591-601
        • Hilgers T.W
        • Abraham G.E
        • Cavanaugh D
        The peak symptom and the estimated time of ovulation.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1978; 52: 575-582
        • Hilgers T.W
        The Ovulation Method of Natural Family Planning. Pope Paul VI Institute Press, Omaha, Nebraska1992
        • Doud J
        Use-effectiveness of the Creighton model of NFP.
        Internat Rev Nat Fam Plan. 1985; 9: 54-72
        • Fehring R
        • Lawrence D
        • Philpot C
        Use effectiveness of the Creighton model ovulation method of natural family planning.
        J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs. 1994; 23: 303-309