Advertisement

Contraceptive failure in the United States

      Abstract

      This review provides an update of previous estimates of first-year probabilities of contraceptive failure for all methods of contraception available in the United States. Estimates are provided of probabilities of failure during typical use (which includes both incorrect and inconsistent use) and during perfect use (correct and consistent use). The difference between these two probabilities reveals the consequences of imperfect use; it depends both on how unforgiving of imperfect use a method is and on how hard it is to use that method perfectly. These revisions reflect new research on contraceptive failure both during perfect use and during typical use.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Grady W.R
        • Klepinger D.H
        • Nelson-Wally A
        Contraceptive characteristics.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1999; 31: 168-175
      1. Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al., editors. Contraceptive technology: eighteenth revised edition. New York: Ardent Media, 2004. p. 773–845

        • Fu H
        • Darroch J.E
        • Haas T
        • Ranjit N
        Contraceptive failure rates.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1999; 31: 56-63
        • Trussell J
        • Sturgen K
        • Strickler J
        • Dominik R
        Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1994; 26: 66-72
        • Audet M.C
        • Moreau M
        • Koltun W.D
        • et al.
        Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive.
        JAMA. 2001; 285: 2347-2354
        • Archer D.F
        • Cullins V
        • Creasy G.W
        • Fisher A.C
        The impact of improved compliance with a weekly contraceptive transdermal system (Ortho Evra®) on contraceptive efficacy.
        Contraception. 2004; 69: 189-195
        • Hall P
        • Bahamondes L
        • Diaz J
        • Petta C
        Introductory study of the once-a-month, injectable contraceptive Cyclofem in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Peru.
        Contraception. 1997; 56: 353-359
        • Kaunitz A.M
        • Garceau R.J
        • Cromie M.A
        • Lunelle Study Group
        Comparative safety, efficacy, and cycle control of Lunelle monthly contraceptive injection (medroxyprogesterone acetate and estradiol cypionate injectable suspension) and Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 oral contraceptive (norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol triphasic).
        Contraception. 1999; 60: 179-187
        • Trussell J
        • Grummer-Strawn L
        Contraceptive failure of the ovulation method of periodic abstinence.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1990; 22: 65-75
        • Richwald G.A
        • Greenland S
        • Gerber M.M
        • Potik R
        • Kersey L
        • Comas M.A
        Effectiveness of the cavity-rim cervical cap.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 74: 143-148
        • Trussell J
        • Strickler J
        • Vaughan B
        Contraceptive efficacy of the diaphragm, the sponge and the cervical cap.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1993; 25 (, 135): 100-105
        • Frezieres R.G
        • Walsh T.L
        • Nelson A.L
        • Clark V.A
        • Coulson A.H
        Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1999; 31: 81-87
        • Walsh T.L
        • Frezieres R.G
        • Peacock K
        • Nelson A.L
        • Clark V.A
        • Bernstein L
        Evaluation of the efficacy of a nonlatex condom.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003; 35: 79-86
        • Steiner M.J
        • Dominik R
        • Rountree R.W
        • Nanda K
        • Dorflinger L.J
        Contraceptive effectiveness of a polyurethane condom and a latex condom.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101: 539-547
        • Farr G
        • Gabelnick H
        • Sturgen K
        • Dorflinger L
        Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom.
        Am J Public Health. 1994; 84: 1960-1964
        • Raymond E.G
        • Chen P.L
        • Luoto J
        Contraceptive effectiveness and safety of five nonoxynol-9 spermicides.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 430-439
        • Ilaria G
        • Jacobs J.L
        • Polsky B
        • et al.
        Detection of HIV-1 DNA sequences in pre-ejaculatory fluid.
        Lancet. 1992; 340: 1469
        • Pudney J
        • Oneta M
        • Mayer K
        • Seage G
        • Anderson D
        Pre-ejaculatory fluid as potential vector for sexual transmission of HIV-1.
        Lancet. 1992; 340: 1470
        • Trussell J
        • Vaughan B
        Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1999; 31 (, 93): 64-72
        • Trussell J
        • Rodríguez G
        • Ellertson C
        Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.
        Contraception. 1999; 59: 147-151
        • Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation
        Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception.
        Lancet. 1998; 352: 428-433
        • Trussell J
        • Ellertson C
        Efficacy of emergency contraception.
        Fertil Control Rev. 1995; 4: 8-11
        • Kennedy K.I
        • Rivera R
        • McNeilly A.S
        Consensus statement on the use of breastfeeding as a family planning method.
        Contraception. 1989; 39: 477-496
        • Kennedy K.I
        • Labbok M.H
        • Van Look P.F.A
        Lactational amenorrhea method for family planning.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996; 54: 55-57
        • Kazi A
        • Kennedy K.I
        • Visness C.M
        • Khan T
        Effectiveness of the lactational amenorrhea method in Pakistan.
        Fertil Steril. 1995; 64: 717-723
        • Labbok M.H
        • Hight-Laukaran V
        • Peterson A.E
        • Fletcher V
        • von Hertzen H
        • Van Look P.F.A
        Multicenter study of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM).
        Contraception. 1997; 55: 327-336
        • Pérez A
        • Labbok M.H
        • Queenan J.T
        Clinical study of the lactational amenorrhoea method for family planning.
        Lancet. 1992; 339: 968-970
        • Ramos R
        • Kennedy K.I
        • Visness C.M
        Effectiveness of lactational amenorrhea in prevention of pregnancy in Manila, the Philippines.
        Br Med J. 1996; 313: 909-912
        • Kestelman P
        • Trussell J
        Efficacy of the simultaneous use of condoms and spermicides.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1991; 23 (, 232): 226-227
        • McIntyre S.L
        • Higgins J.E
        Parity and use-effectiveness with the contraceptive sponge.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 155: 796-801
        • Menken J
        • Trussell J
        • Larsen U
        Age and infertility.
        Science. 1986; 233: 1389-1394
        • Grady W.R
        • Hayward M.D
        • Yagi J
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1986; 18: 200-209
        • Schirm A.L
        • Trussell J
        • Menken J
        • Grady W.R
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1982; 14: 68-75
        • Sivin I
        • Schmidt F
        Effectiveness of IUDs.
        Contraception. 1987; 36: 55-84
        • Vessey M
        • Lawless M
        • Yeates D
        Efficacy of different contraceptive methods.
        Lancet. 1982; 1: 841-842
        • Trussell J
        • Westoff C.F
        Contraceptive practice and trends in coital frequency.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1980; 12: 246-249
        • Trussell J
        • Kost K
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Stud Fam Plann. 1987; 18: 237-283
        • Davis H.J
        The shield intrauterine device. A superior modern contraceptive.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 106: 455-456
        • Mintz M
        At any cost.
        Pantheon Books, New York1985
        • Tietze C
        • Poliakoff S.R
        • Rock J
        The clinical effectiveness of the rhythm method of contraception.
        Fertil Steril. 1951; 2: 444-450
        • Trussell J
        • Menken J
        Life table analysis of contraceptive failure.
        in: Hermalin A.I Entwisle B The role of surveys in the analysis of family planning programs. Ordina Editions, Liege, Belgium1982: 537-571
        • Trussell J
        Methodological pitfalls in the analysis of contraceptive failure.
        Stat Med. 1991; 10: 201-220