Advertisement

Contraceptive failures and determinants of emergency contraception use

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Two years after emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) were made available without prescription in France, we investigated the determinants of ECP use in a representative sample of women at risk for unintended pregnancy.

      Study Design

      This study is based on data collected from a population-based cohort exploring contraceptive practices and abortion (N=2863).

      Results

      Among the 706 women at risk for unintended pregnancy during the first year of follow-up (2001), only 11.1% used ECPs. Women in stable relationships or using the same contraceptive method during the year were less likely to use ECPs than other women. The study also demonstrates that detailed knowledge of ECPs increases the probability of its subsequent use.

      Conclusions

      Given the low frequency of ECP use in cases of unintended pregnancy risk, these results suggest that information campaigns should be targeted not only at women with irregular contraceptive practices but also at women who experience errors in the use of their regular contraceptive method.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bajos N.
        • Leridon H.
        • Goulard H.
        • Oustry P.
        • Job-Spira N.
        Contraception: from accessibility to efficiency.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 994-999
        • Trussell J.
        • Ellertson C.
        • Stewart F.
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Shochet T.
        The role of emergency contraception.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: S30-S38
        • Glasier A.
        Safety of emergency contraception.
        J Am Med Women's Assoc. 1998; 53: 219-221
        • Ellertson C.
        • Shochet T.
        • Blanchard K.
        • Trussell J.
        Emergency contraception: a review of the programmatic and social science literature.
        Contraception. 2000; 61: 145-186
        • Bajos N.
        • Goulard H.
        • Job-Spira N.
        Emergency contraception: from accessibility to counseling.
        Contraception. 2003; 67: 39-40
        • Delbanco S.F.
        • Mauldon J.
        • Smith M.D.
        Little knowledge and limited practice: emergency contraceptive pills, the public, and the obstetrician���gynecologist.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 1006-1011
        • Schenk K.D.
        Emergency contraception: lessons learned from the UK.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2003; 29: 35-40
        • Hu X.
        • Cheng L.
        • Hua X.
        • Glasier A.
        Advanced provision of emergency contraception to postnatal women in China makes no difference in abortion rates: a randomized controlled trial.
        Contraception. 2005; 72: 111-116
        • Aneblom G.
        • Larsson M.
        • Odlind V.
        • Tyden T.
        Knowledge, use and attitudes towards emergency contraceptive pills among Swedish women presenting for induced abortion.
        BJOG. 2002; 109: 155-160
        • Sorensen M.B.
        • Pedersen B.L.
        • Nyrnberg L.E.
        Differences between users and non-users of emergency contraception after a recognized unprotected intercourse.
        Contraception. 2000; 62: 1-3
        • Glasier A.
        • Fairhurst K.
        • Wyke S.
        • et al.
        Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates.
        Contraception. 2004; 69: 361-366
        • Moreau C.
        • Bouyer J.
        • Goulard H.
        • Bajos N.
        The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions.
        Contraception. 2005; 71: 202-207
        • Delbanco S.F.
        • Parker M.L.
        • McIntosh M.
        • Kannel S.
        • Hoff T.
        • Stewart F.H.
        Missed opportunities: teenagers and emergency contraception.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998; 152: 727-733
        • Raine T.
        • Harper C.
        • Leon K.
        • Darney P.
        Emergency contraception: advance provision in a young, high-risk clinic population.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 1-7
        • Free C.
        • Lee R.M.
        • Ogden J.
        Young women's accounts of factors influencing their use and non-use of emergency contraception: in-depth interview study.
        BMJ. 2002; 325: 1393-1395
        • Stewart H.E.
        • Gold M.A.
        • Parker A.M.
        The impact of using emergency contraception on reproductive health outcomes: a retrospective review in an urban adolescent clinic.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2003; 16: 313-318
        • Harper C.C.
        • Cheong M.
        • Rocca C.H.
        • Darney P.D.
        • Raine T.R.
        The effect of increased access to emergency contraception among young adolescents.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 483-491
        • Belzer M.
        • Yoshida E.
        • Tejirian T.
        • Tucker D.
        • Chung K.K.S.
        Advanced supply of emergency contraception for adolescent mothers increased utilization without reducing condom or primary contraception use.
        J Adolesc Health. 2003; 32: 122-123
        • Jamieson M.A.
        • Hertweck S.P.
        • Sanfilippo J.S.
        Emergency contraception: lack of awareness among patients presenting for pregnancy termination.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1999; 12: 11-15
        • Perslev A.
        • Rorbye C.
        • Boesen H.C.
        • Norgaard M.
        • Nilas L.
        Emergency contraception: knowledge and use among Danish women requesting termination of pregnancy.
        Contraception. 2002; 66: 427-431
        • Jackson R.
        • Bimla Schwarz E.
        • Freedman L.
        • Darney P.
        Knowledge and willingness to use emergency contraception among low-income post-partum women.
        Contraception. 2000; 61: 351-357
        • Jackson R.A.
        • Bimla Schwarz E.
        • Freedman L.
        • Darney P.
        Advance supply of emergency contraception. Effect on use and usual contraception ��� a randomized trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 8-16
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Chen P.L.
        • Dalebout S.M.
        ���Actual use��� study of emergency contraceptive pills provided in a simulated over-the-counter manner.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 17-23
        • Razafindratsima N.
        • Kishimba N.
        • Cocon E.
        La d��perdition dans la cohorte Cocon entre 2000 et 2002.
        Population. 2004; 59: 419-448
        • StataCorp
        Stata Statistical Software: release 7.0SE.
        Stata Corporation, College Station (TX)2002
        • Lete I.
        • Cabero L.
        • Alvarez D.
        • Olle C.
        Observational study on the use of emergency contraception in Spain: results of a national survey.
        Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003; 8: 203-209
        • Killick S.R.
        • Irving G.
        A national study examining the effect of making emergency hormonal contraception available without prescription.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 553-557
        • Potter L.
        • Oakley D.
        • de Leon-Wong E.
        • Canamar R.
        Measuring compliance among oral contraceptive users.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1996; 28: 154-158
        • Trussell J.
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Contraception. 2004; 70: 89-96
        • Foster D.G.
        • Harper C.C.
        • Bley J.J.
        • et al.
        Knowledge of emergency contraception among women aged 18 to 44 in California.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 150-156
        • Isaacs J.N.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Miscommunication between healthcare providers and patients may result in unplanned pregnancies.
        Contraception. 2003; 68: 373-376
        • Raine T.R.
        • Harper C.C.
        • Rocca C.H.
        • et al.
        Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 54-62
        • Ellertson C.
        • Ambardekar S.
        • Hedley A.
        • Coyaji K.
        • Trussell J.
        • Blanchard K.
        Emergency contraception: randomized comparison of advance provision and information only.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98: 570-575
        • Glasier A.
        • Baird D.
        The effects of self-administering emergency contraception.
        N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1-4
        • Lo S.S.
        • Fan S.Y.
        • Ho P.C.
        • Glasier A.F.
        Effect of advanced provision of emergency contraception on women's contraceptive behaviour: a randomized controlled trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 2404-2410
        • Rowlands S.
        • Devalia H.
        • Lawrenson R.
        • Logie J.
        • Ineichen B.
        Repeated use of hormonal emergency contraception by younger women in the UK.
        Br J Fam Plan. 2000; 26: 138-143