Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 75, ISSUE 2, P119-125, February 2007

Download started.

Ok

Acceptance and use of emergency contraception with standardized counseling intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial

  • Ruth Petersen
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Center for Women's Health Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7521, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7521, USA. Tel.: +1 919 966 7924; fax: +1 919 843 3120.
    Affiliations
    Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    UNC Center for Women's Health Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Cecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jennifer B. Albright
    Affiliations
    UNC Center for Women's Health Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Cecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Joanne M. Garrett
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    UNC Center for Women's Health Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Cecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kathryn M. Curtis
    Affiliations
    Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Objective

      The objective of this work was to evaluate the acceptance, use and recall of an optional advance prescription for emergency contraception (EC).

      Materials and methods

      This study used as randomized controlled trial evaluating contraceptive counseling intervention with women aged 16���44 years who were at risk for unintended pregnancy (N=737). Intervention participants (n=365) received contraceptive counseling with optional advance EC prescription. Control women (n=372) received no contraceptive or EC counseling. Among intervention participants, initial acceptance and use of EC in first 2 months were evaluated. Among all participants, differences were evaluated between recall of EC discussion and use of EC.

      Results

      Among 365 intervention women, 336 received EC counseling and 51% of these 336 accepted advance EC prescription. At 2 months, among the women who had accepted EC, 6% had filled and used their prescription and 8% had filled but not used their prescription. At 12 months, intervention women were significantly more likely than controls to recall talking about EC (33% vs. 5%) and obtaining a prescription (38% vs. 6%), but there were no differences in the use of EC (6% vs. 6%).

      Conclusion

      When the option is available for EC counseling, approximately half of women accepted advance prescription for EC. However, few women who received information and/or an advance prescription remembered discussing EC, filled the prescription or used EC over 12 months.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mosher W.D.
        • Martinez G.M.
        • Chandra A.
        • Abma J.C.
        • Willson S.J.
        Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982���2002.
        Adv Data. 2004; : 1-36
        • Trussell J.
        • Rodriguez G.
        • Ellertson C.
        Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.
        Contraception. 1999; 59: 147-151
        • Trussell J.
        • Ellertson C.
        • von Hertzen H.
        • et al.
        Estimating the effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills.
        Contraception. 2003; 67: 259-265
        • Hatcher R.A.
        • Trussel J.
        • Stewart F.H.
        • et al.
        Contraceptive technology.
        18th ed. Ardent Media, Inc, New York2004
        • ACOG Practice Bulletin
        Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician���gynecologists, number 69, December 2005 (replaces Practice Bulletin Number 25, March 2001). Emergency contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 1443-1451
        • Trussell J.
        • Ellertson C.
        • Stewart F.
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Shochet T.
        The role of emergency contraception.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: S30-S388
        • Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation
        Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception.
        Lancet. 1998; 352: 428-433
        • American Medical Association
        AMA policy finder���H-75.985 access to emergency contraception.
        (accessed October 4)
        • Gold M.A.
        • Sucato G.S.
        • Conard L.A.
        • Hillard P.J.
        Provision of emergency contraception to adolescents.
        J Adolesc Health. 2004; 35: 67-70
      1. Women's health care providers' experiences with emergency contraception.
        The J. Henry Kasier Family Foundation, Menlo Park (CA)2003
        • Fairhurst K.
        • Ziebland S.
        • Wyke S.
        • Seaman P.
        • Glasier A.
        Emergency contraception: why can't you give it away? Qualitative findings from an evaluation of advance provision of emergency contraception.
        Contraception. 2004; 70: 25-29
        • Camp S.L.
        • Wilkerson D.S.
        • Raine T.R.
        The benefits and risks of over-the-counter availability of levonorgestrel emergency contraception.
        Contraception. 2003; 68: 309-317
        • Glasier A.
        • Baird D.
        The effects of self-administering emergency contraception.
        N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1-4
        • Jackson R.A.
        • Bimla Schwarz E.
        • Freedman L.
        • Darney P.
        Advance supply of emergency contraception. effect on use and usual contraception ��� a randomized trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 8-16
        • Gold M.A.
        • Wolford J.E.
        • Smith K.A.
        • Parker A.M.
        The effects of advance provision of emergency contraception on adolescent women's sexual and contraceptive behaviors.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004; 17: 87-96
        • Belzer M.
        • Yoshida B.S.
        • Tejirian T.
        • Tucker D.
        • Chung K.
        • Sanchez K.
        Advanced supply of emergency contraception for adolescent mothers increased utilization without reducing condom or primary contraceptive use.
        J Adolesc Health. 2003; 32: 122-123
        • Raine T.R.
        • Harper C.C.
        • Rocca C.H.
        • et al.
        Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 54-62
        • Lo S.S.
        • Fan S.Y.
        • Ho P.C.
        • Glasier A.F.
        Effect of advanced provision of emergency contraception on women's contraceptive behaviour: a randomized controlled trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 2404-2410
        • Raine T.
        • Harper C.
        • Leon K.
        • Darney P.
        Emergency contraception: advance provision in a young, high-risk clinic population.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 1-7
      2. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use.
        World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2004
        • Beckman L.J.
        • Harvey S.M.
        • Sherman C.A.
        • Petitti D.B.
        Changes in providers' views and practices about emergency contraception with education.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97: 942-946
        • World Health Organization
        Decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers 2005.
        (Accessed March 14, 2006)
        • International Consortium for Emergency Contraception
        (Accessed March 14, 2006)